Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Idaho v. Brogan Brianna Pulliam
Date: 11-08-2024
Case Number: 49977
Judge: Steven J. Hippler
Court: Fourth Judicial District Court,
Plaintiff's Attorney: Ada County, Idaho Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Boise Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
The State charged Brogan Brianna Pulliam with possession of a controlled substance, concealment of evidence, introduction of paraphernalia into a correctional facility, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of a legend drug. Pulliam filed a motion to suppress, arguing that she was unlawfully detained when officers expanded the traffic stop to request consent to search and that the search of her vehicle was unlawful because she revoked her consent. The State objected to the motion and argued that probable cause existed to search the vehicle under the automobile exception and, alternatively, that Pulliam had consented to the search. Following a hearing on the motion to suppress, the district court denied Pulliam's motion. The district court found probable cause supported the search pursuant to the automobile exception. Pulliam entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(c), preserving the right to challenge the denial of her motion to suppress.
State v. Pulliam, 49977 (Idaho App. Nov 08, 2024)
Boise, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with "possession of a controlled substance, concealment of evidence, introduction of paraphernalia into a correctional facility, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of a legend drug.
The State charged Brogan Brianna Pulliam with possession of a controlled substance, concealment of evidence, introduction of paraphernalia into a correctional facility, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of a legend drug. Pulliam filed a motion to suppress, arguing that she was unlawfully detained when officers expanded the traffic stop to request consent to search and that the search of her vehicle was unlawful because she revoked her consent. The State objected to the motion and argued that probable cause existed to search the vehicle under the automobile exception and, alternatively, that Pulliam had consented to the search. Following a hearing on the motion to suppress, the district court denied Pulliam's motion. The district court found probable cause supported the search pursuant to the automobile exception. Pulliam entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(c), preserving the right to challenge the denial of her motion to suppress.
State v. Pulliam, 49977 (Idaho App. Nov 08, 2024)
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Idaho v. Brogan Brianna Pulliam?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard State of Idaho v. Brogan Brianna Pulliam?
This case was heard in Fourth Judicial District Court,, ID. The presiding judge was Steven J. Hippler.
Who were the attorneys in State of Idaho v. Brogan Brianna Pulliam?
Plaintiff's attorney: Ada County, Idaho Prosecuting Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Boise Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Idaho v. Brogan Brianna Pulliam decided?
This case was decided on November 8, 2024.