Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Idaho v. Wendall Eric Northrup
Date: 01-06-2025
Case Number: 49885
Judge: Jason D. Scott
Court: Fourth Judicial District Court, Ada County, Idaho
Plaintiff's Attorney: Ada County, Idaho District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Boise Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Boise, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic battery.
Northrup and his girlfriend (J.B.) were involved in a physical altercation that resulted in J.B. sustaining injuries to her face, neck, and chest. After J.B. sought aid for her injuries at the hospital, Northrup was charged with attempted strangulation (Idaho Code § 18-923), and domestic battery (I.C. § 18-918(2), 903(a)).
Defendant was found guilty.
* * *
EVIDENCE LAW. ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS FOR IMPEACHMENT. The case involves the admissibility of a prior felony conviction for larceny as impeachment evidence under Idaho Rule of Evidence 609(a), where the court had to determine if the conviction was relevant to the defendant's credibility and if its probative value outweighed its prejudicial effect.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. ABUSE OF DISCRETION REVIEW. The appellate court considered whether the district court abused its discretion in admitting a prior felony conviction for impeachment purposes, applying a multi-tiered inquiry to determine adherence to legal standards and reasoned decision-making.
Key Phrases Felony domestic battery. Impeachment evidence. Prior felony conviction. Idaho Rule of Evidence 609. Probative value.
Northrup and his girlfriend (J.B.) were involved in a physical altercation that resulted in J.B. sustaining injuries to her face, neck, and chest. After J.B. sought aid for her injuries at the hospital, Northrup was charged with attempted strangulation (Idaho Code § 18-923), and domestic battery (I.C. § 18-918(2), 903(a)).
Defendant was found guilty.
* * *
EVIDENCE LAW. ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR CONVICTIONS FOR IMPEACHMENT. The case involves the admissibility of a prior felony conviction for larceny as impeachment evidence under Idaho Rule of Evidence 609(a), where the court had to determine if the conviction was relevant to the defendant's credibility and if its probative value outweighed its prejudicial effect.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. ABUSE OF DISCRETION REVIEW. The appellate court considered whether the district court abused its discretion in admitting a prior felony conviction for impeachment purposes, applying a multi-tiered inquiry to determine adherence to legal standards and reasoned decision-making.
Key Phrases Felony domestic battery. Impeachment evidence. Prior felony conviction. Idaho Rule of Evidence 609. Probative value.
Outcome:
Affirmed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Idaho v. Wendall Eric Northrup?
The outcome was: Affirmed.
Which court heard State of Idaho v. Wendall Eric Northrup?
This case was heard in Fourth Judicial District Court, Ada County, Idaho, ID. The presiding judge was Jason D. Scott.
Who were the attorneys in State of Idaho v. Wendall Eric Northrup?
Plaintiff's attorney: Ada County, Idaho District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Boise Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was State of Idaho v. Wendall Eric Northrup decided?
This case was decided on January 6, 2025.