Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Michael Seery and Ricardo Obando, Jr.

Date: 05-05-2026

Case Number: 4:25-cr-00146

Judge: David Hittner

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Harris County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Houston

Defendant's Attorney: Paul Morgan for Seery and Tillet Mills for Ricardo

Description:
Houston, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Murder-For-Hire.

By Kent Morlan

Michael Seery hired Ricardo Obando to kill a man he believed had an affair with Seery’s wife while Seery was in prison. Cell phone evidence demonstrated how Obando conducted extensive surveillance and a failed attempt on the victim before finally executing the plot.

Obando shot the victim using a firearm equipped with a silencer while the man was driving to work on Highway 99. Jurors heard testimony from the victim and watched the actual footage of the shooting captured on his in-car camera system, which showed the moment of the shooting and the subsequent 911 call.

In reality, Seery targeted the wrong person. The actual intended target had moved out of the residence where Seery believed he lived.

The intended target testified as did Seery’s wife. The jury heard about the affair that had occurred 12 years prior and that Seery could not get over it. Testimony revealed that even in January 2025, a few weeks before the murder attempt, Seery was angry about the affair.

Evidence included multiple photos of various firearms and firearm parts found at Seery’s home and storage unit. The jury also saw the 3D printer Seery used to manufacture the weapon and silencer that Obando is believed to have used.

Seery had paid Obando through his business to carry out the crime.

The defense attempted to convince the jury there was no evidence about the real intended target or that there was any relationship between the two men and the actual victim, or the intended target. Obando’s defense disputed cellular phone evidence, while Seery claimed he was not involved at in the conspiracy. The jury did not believe any of those claims and found the two men guilty as charged.

Both have been and will remain in custody pending transfer to a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

The FBI and Harris County Sheriff’s Office conducted the investigation along with Texas Department of Public Safety and Katy Police Department with assistance of Harris County District Attorney’s Office. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Hunter Brown and Jill Stotts prosecuted the case.
Outcome:
The Defendants were found guilt.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Michael Seery and Ricardo Oba...?

The outcome was: The Defendants were found guilt.

Which court heard United States of America v. Michael Seery and Ricardo Oba...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Harris County), TX. The presiding judge was David Hittner.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Michael Seery and Ricardo Oba...?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Houston. Defendant's attorney: Paul Morgan for Seery and Tillet Mills for Ricardo.

When was United States of America v. Michael Seery and Ricardo Oba... decided?

This case was decided on May 5, 2026.