Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Patricia Conway v. Mercy Hospital St. Louis

Date: 08-05-2025

Case Number: 4:22-cv-01113

Judge: Ronnie L. White

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best St. Louis Empoyment Law Lawyer Directory





Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best St. Louis Insurance Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
St. Louis, Missouri employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights violation theory.



During the COVID-19 pandemic, Patricia Conway, a registered nurse, was terminated from Mercy Hospital St. Louis ("Mercy Hospital”)—a non-profit healthcare facility owned and operated by Mercy Health Ministries—after she refused to comply with the hospital's vaccination policy. The policy required all employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine unless they obtained an approved medical or religious exemption. Mercy Hospital denied. After Conway was terminated for noncompliance with the policy, she commenced this action alleging religious discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.



* * *



Title VII generally prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of their religious beliefs. However, Congress created a limited exemption for "religious organizations.” See Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos, 483 U.S. 327, 329 (1987) (discussing 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1(a)). The exemption provides:



[Title VII] shall not apply to . . . a religious corporation, association,

educational institution, or society with respect to the employment of

individuals of a particular religion to perform work connected with the

carrying on by such corporation, association, educational institution, or

society of its activities.



Because Congress did not define what makes an organization "religious,” courts look to the ordinary meaning of the term. Taniguchi v. Kan Pac. Saipan, Ltd., 566 U.S. 560, 566 (2012).
Outcome:
Motion for summary judgment granted.



Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Patricia Conway v. Mercy Hospital St. Louis?

The outcome was: Motion for summary judgment granted. Affirmed

Which court heard Patricia Conway v. Mercy Hospital St. Louis?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County), MO. The presiding judge was Ronnie L. White.

Who were the attorneys in Patricia Conway v. Mercy Hospital St. Louis?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best St. Louis Empoyment Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best St. Louis Insurance Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was Patricia Conway v. Mercy Hospital St. Louis decided?

This case was decided on August 5, 2025.