Defendant's Attorney: Kerry J. Kemp and Eric B. Tucker
Description:
Fort Worth, Texas social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial by HHS of her application for Social Security: SSID Title XVI benefits.
Social Security SSID Title XVI benefits, also known as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), is a federal program that provides cash payments to low-income individuals who are blind, disabled, or aged (65 years or older). The benefits are based on need, not on work history.
To qualify for SSI benefits, you must meet the following criteria:
You must be a U.S. citizen or a legal permanent resident.
You must have limited income and resources.
You must be blind, disabled, or aged.
The amount of your SSI benefit will depend on your income and resources. If you are married, your spouse's income and resources may also be considered.
SSI benefits are not taxable and do not count as income when determining eligibility for other benefits, such as Medicaid or food stamps.
If you think you may be eligible for SSI benefits, you can apply online, by phone, or in person at your local Social Security office.
Here are some of the benefits of SSI:
Cash payments to help meet basic living expenses.
Medicaid coverage for medical care.
Free Medicare Part A (hospital insurance) if you are 65 or older.
Free Medicare Part B (medical insurance) if your income is below certain limits.
Free eyeglasses and hearing aids.
Discounts on transportation, housing, and other services.
If you are eligible for SSI benefits, you may also be eligible for other federal and state benefits. You should contact your local Social Security office to learn more about your eligibility for other benefits.
Outcome:
07/13/2023 20 ORDER ACCEPTING 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/13/2023) (saw) (Entered: 07/13/2023)
07/13/2023 21 FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment, together with a true copy of the 20 Order accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/13/2023) (saw) (Entered: 07/13/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Related Cases from United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Tarrant County)
What was the outcome of Kathleen K. McMillian v. Social Security Administration?
The outcome was: 07/13/2023 20 ORDER ACCEPTING 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/13/2023) (saw) (Entered: 07/13/2023)
07/13/2023 21 FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment, together with a true copy of the 20 Order accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/13/2023) (saw) (Entered: 07/13/2023)
Which court heard Kathleen K. McMillian v. Social Security Administration?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Tarrant County), TX. The presiding judge was Reed C. O'Connor.
Who were the attorneys in Kathleen K. McMillian v. Social Security Administration?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Fort Worth Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Kerry J. Kemp and Eric B. Tucker.
When was Kathleen K. McMillian v. Social Security Administration decided?