Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Brittany Rhiannon Mazon v. Social Security Administraion

Date: 05-19-2021

Case Number: 4:20-cv-00010-TMB

Judge: Timothy M. Burgess

Court: United States District Court for the District of Alaska (North Star County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



FairbanksSocial Security Disability Lawyer Directory



Defendant's Attorney: Jeffrey E. Staples

Description:
Fairbanks, Alaska social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for DIWC benefits.
Outcome:
Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on May 13, 2021. (NMG, CHAMBERS STAFF) (Entered: 05/13/2021)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Related Cases from United States District Court for the District of Alaska (North Star County)
United States of America v. Dwayne Thrasher 05/18/2021
Aaron A. Majors v. Social Security Administration 04/06/2021
View More AK Cases
Alaska Attorneys
Rebecca Lindemann Anchorage, AK
Insurance Defense
Steven Wells Anchorage, AK
Criminal Defense
Mark Choate Juneau, AK
Plaintiff's Personal Injury Litigation; Products L...
William Vitkus Kodiak, AK
Prosecution of Crimes
Find More Alaska Attorneys

About This Case

What was the outcome of Brittany Rhiannon Mazon v. Social Security Administraion?

The outcome was: Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Timothy M. Burgess on May 13, 2021. (NMG, CHAMBERS STAFF) (Entered: 05/13/2021)

Which court heard Brittany Rhiannon Mazon v. Social Security Administraion?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Alaska (North Star County), AK. The presiding judge was Timothy M. Burgess.

Who were the attorneys in Brittany Rhiannon Mazon v. Social Security Administraion?

Plaintiff's attorney: FairbanksSocial Security Disability Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Jeffrey E. Staples.

When was Brittany Rhiannon Mazon v. Social Security Administraion decided?

This case was decided on May 19, 2021.