Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

William Cairnas v. Idaho Falls School District No. 91

Date: 10-26-2021

Case Number: 4:18-cv-00564-BLW

Judge: B. Lynn Winmill

Court: United States District Court for the District of Idaho (Bannock County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Best Pocatello Civil Rights Lawyer Directory



Defendant's Attorney: Bret Allen Walther, Brian K. Julian, Scott W. Marotz

Description:
Pocatello, Idaho civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on Job Discrimination (Age) theory.
Outcome:
12/23/2021 112 REPLY to Response to Motion re 110 MOTION for New Trial filed by William Cairns.Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/27/2021.(Casperson, DeAnne)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of William Cairnas v. Idaho Falls School District No. 91?

The outcome was: 12/23/2021 112 REPLY to Response to Motion re 110 MOTION for New Trial filed by William Cairns.Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/27/2021.(Casperson, DeAnne)

Which court heard William Cairnas v. Idaho Falls School District No. 91?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Idaho (Bannock County), ID. The presiding judge was B. Lynn Winmill.

Who were the attorneys in William Cairnas v. Idaho Falls School District No. 91?

Plaintiff's attorney: Best Pocatello Civil Rights Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Bret Allen Walther, Brian K. Julian, Scott W. Marotz.

When was William Cairnas v. Idaho Falls School District No. 91 decided?

This case was decided on October 26, 2021.