Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Delbert Jackson v. National Association of Letter Carriers

Date: 05-24-2019

Case Number: 4:18-cv-00500-RLW

Judge: Ronnie L. White

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Christopher B. Bent

Defendant's Attorney: James I. Singer, JOshua J. Ellison, Marilyn S. Teitelbaum

Description:



MoreLaw Virtual Receptionists


A Receptionist for Less Than a Dollar an Hour





St. Louis, MO - Delbert Jackson sued National Association of Letter Carriers on a civil rights theory.
Outcome:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Delbert Jackson's claims against Defendants National Postal Mail Handlers Union and National Association of Letter Carriers are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 05/24/2019. (KCB) (Entered: 05/24/2019)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Delbert Jackson v. National Association of Letter Carriers?

The outcome was: ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Delbert Jackson's claims against Defendants National Postal Mail Handlers Union and National Association of Letter Carriers are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 05/24/2019. (KCB) (Entered: 05/24/2019)

Which court heard Delbert Jackson v. National Association of Letter Carriers?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County), MO. The presiding judge was Ronnie L. White.

Who were the attorneys in Delbert Jackson v. National Association of Letter Carriers?

Plaintiff's attorney: Christopher B. Bent. Defendant's attorney: James I. Singer, JOshua J. Ellison, Marilyn S. Teitelbaum.

When was Delbert Jackson v. National Association of Letter Carriers decided?

This case was decided on May 24, 2019.