Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Michael Gunn, et al. v. City of Ferguson, Missouri
Date: 06-18-2024
Case Number: 4:15-cv-00253
Judge: Audrey G. Fleissig
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best St. Louis, Missouri civil rights Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Timothy William Rudolph, et al.
St. Louis, Missouri civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on civil rights violation theories.
06/18/2024 684 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTINGFINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Settlement Agreement is given final approval as fair, reasonable, and adequate for the settlement of the claims of the Class Members. 2. The Parties will comply with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and the terms of the settlement are incorporated in this Order and Judgment. 3. All Class Members, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns are bound by this Final Approval Order and Judgment. The Settlement Classes are defined as: (See order for full details.). Signed by Sr. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/18/24. (KJS) (Entered: 06/18/2024)
06/18/2024 685 JUDGMENT - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Class Action Settlement, entered into by and between the parties to resolve all outstanding claims in this action, is APPROVED. The Order and Final Judgment Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, and this Judgment entered thereon, are considered final and appealable as of the date of their entry. Pursuant to Local Rule 13.05, Section B(2), if a party wishes for any documents previously filed under seal to remain sealed, a Motion to Continue Sealing must be filed in this case within 90 days following the final disposition of the litigation. 60-Day Reminder for LR 13.05 Unsealing 8/19/2024 90-day Reminder for LR 13.05 Unsealing 9/16/2024 Signed by Sr. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/18/24. (KJS) (Entered: 06/18/2024)
About This Case
What was the outcome of Michael Gunn, et al. v. City of Ferguson, Missouri?
The outcome was: 06/18/2024 683 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before Sr. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig: Motion Hearing held on 6/18/2024 re 678 MOTION for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and 680 MOTION for Attorney Fees Costs, and Service Awards. Discussion held. The Court grants the Motion for Settlement and Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs and Service Awards. Order to follow. (Court Reporter:Reagan Fiorino, Reagan_Fiorino@moed.uscourts.gov, 314-244-7989) (proceedings started: 9:38 am) (proceedings ended: 10:35 am) (Deputy Clerk: C. Thoele)(Appearance for Plaintiff: Maureen Hanlon, Kathryn Hong and Brendan Roediger)(Appearance for Defendant: Jason Retter) (CLT) (Entered: 06/18/2024) 06/18/2024 684 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTINGFINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Settlement Agreement is given final approval as fair, reasonable, and adequate for the settlement of the claims of the Class Members. 2. The Parties will comply with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and the terms of the settlement are incorporated in this Order and Judgment. 3. All Class Members, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns are bound by this Final Approval Order and Judgment. The Settlement Classes are defined as: (See order for full details.). Signed by Sr. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/18/24. (KJS) (Entered: 06/18/2024) 06/18/2024 685 JUDGMENT - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Class Action Settlement, entered into by and between the parties to resolve all outstanding claims in this action, is APPROVED. The Order and Final Judgment Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, and this Judgment entered thereon, are considered final and appealable as of the date of their entry. Pursuant to Local Rule 13.05, Section B(2), if a party wishes for any documents previously filed under seal to remain sealed, a Motion to Continue Sealing must be filed in this case within 90 days following the final disposition of the litigation. 60-Day Reminder for LR 13.05 Unsealing 8/19/2024 90-day Reminder for LR 13.05 Unsealing 9/16/2024 Signed by Sr. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/18/24. (KJS) (Entered: 06/18/2024)
Which court heard Michael Gunn, et al. v. City of Ferguson, Missouri?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County), MO. The presiding judge was Audrey G. Fleissig.
Who were the attorneys in Michael Gunn, et al. v. City of Ferguson, Missouri?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best St. Louis, Missouri civil rights Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Timothy William Rudolph, et al..
When was Michael Gunn, et al. v. City of Ferguson, Missouri decided?
This case was decided on June 18, 2024.