Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
On Demand Machine v. Ingram Industries, the parent of both LSI and Ingram book Company
Date: 03-05-2004
Case Number: 4:01-cv-01668-MLM
Judge: Mary Ann L. Medler
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Plaintiff's Attorney:
David B. Helfrey, Michael Musich and Bill Cunningham of Helfrey and Simon, P.C., St. Louis, Missouri and Douglas D. Churovich, McPherson D. Moore and William B. Cunningham, Jr. of Polster and Lieder, St. Louis, Missouri
Defendant's Attorney:
Jennifer E. Hoekel and Keith A. Rabenberg of Senniger and Powers, St. Louis, Missouri for Ingram Industries, Inc., Lightning Source, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc.
Patent infringement claim by On Demand Machine Corporation against LaVergne-based Lightning Source, parent company Ingram Books of Nashville and amazon.com relating to alleged infringement of a patent held by On Demand Machine for the printing, binding and covering of books within minutes of a consumer's order being placed. he offense was the violation of a patent for the printing of a book on demand pursuant to a particular method. The method does not require the immediate printing of the book in response to the customer's (not consumer's) selection.
The defendants claimed the On Demand Machine's patent was invalid.
Bruce Baebler on infringement and Ed Renner on damages and patent issues.
Frank Romano of Rodchester, New York, Larry Nixon of Alexandria, Virginia, and Ken Brooks, New York City.
About This Case
What was the outcome of On Demand Machine v. Ingram Industries, the parent of bot...?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $15 million.
Which court heard On Demand Machine v. Ingram Industries, the parent of bot...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, MO. The presiding judge was Mary Ann L. Medler.
Who were the attorneys in On Demand Machine v. Ingram Industries, the parent of bot...?
Plaintiff's attorney: David B. Helfrey, Michael Musich and Bill Cunningham of Helfrey and Simon, P.C., St. Louis, Missouri and Douglas D. Churovich, McPherson D. Moore and William B. Cunningham, Jr. of Polster and Lieder, St. Louis, Missouri. Defendant's attorney: Jennifer E. Hoekel and Keith A. Rabenberg of Senniger and Powers, St. Louis, Missouri for Ingram Industries, Inc., Lightning Source, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..
When was On Demand Machine v. Ingram Industries, the parent of bot... decided?
This case was decided on March 5, 2004.