In re the Marriage of: Craig Jerald Mackey v. Beth Ann Mackey

Grand Rapids, Minnesota family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

Craig Jerald Mackey and Beth Ann Mackey married in Minnesota in 1987 and had two adult children together. For most of the marriage, Craig was employed as an electrical lineman, while Beth Ann worked a variety of jobs. Craig consistently earned a higher wage than Beth Ann did.



Over time, the parties faced financial difficulties and lost their home in a foreclosure proceeding. They moved to a cabin in Nashwauk (the Nashwauk cabin), which Craig built on a vacant 5.78-acre piece of lakefront property (the 5.78-acre property). Craig's parents, Jerald and Rosalie Mackey, had transferred the 5.78-acre property to Craig and Beth Ann in 1993 by a deed that named them both as the new title holders. The Nashwauk cabin had wood heating and an outhouse with no septic system. While living at the Nashwauk cabin, the parties purchased a house in Keewatin (the Keewatin house), which they remodeled by fixing the floors and walls and adding insulation, windows, and a bathroom. The parties made mortgage payments on the Nashwauk cabin throughout the marriage.



After living in the Nashwauk cabin for a few years, Beth Ann moved to the Keewatin house, while Craig split his time between the two properties because of work-related travel. Eventually, Craig paid for a septic system to be installed at the Nashwauk cabin. He connected the septic system to the toilet, but not to any other appliances or parts of the cabin.



In June 2021, the parties separated, and Craig petitioned for dissolution of marriage later that year. The district court held a three-day trial at which both parties testified and submitted documentary evidence regarding their marriage, assets, income, and living expenses. In an order dated February 16, 2023, the district court issued its initial findings of fact and conclusions of law, instructing Craig to pay Beth Ann $1,000 monthly as temporary spousal maintenance beginning in January 2022, until her 70th birthday. In settling on that amount, as relevant here, the district court excluded from Beth Ann's monthly expenses a $514 mortgage payment, a $250 campsite fee for the parties' camper, and a $700 medical-insurance expense, and the court included only half of Beth Ann's requested $640 in travel expenses. The court included in Craig's monthly expenses a line item for $500 in repair and maintenance costs for the Nashwauk cabin.



In distributing the parties' property, the district court determined that their marital property included the Nashwauk cabin, the surrounding property that the parties jointly purchased during their marriage (the 10.95-acre property), and the Keewatin house. The district court awarded the Nashwauk cabin and the surrounding 10.95-acre property to Craig and the Keewatin house to Beth Ann. It also awarded the 5.78-acre property underlying the Nashwauk cabin to Craig, because it determined that the 5.78-acre property was gifted to Craig and was thus his nonmarital property.



* * *



FAMILY LAW. SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE. The case involves cross-appeals in a marriage dissolution proceeding where the petitioner contested the district court's decision on temporary spousal maintenance based on a reevaluation of the parties' expenses and changed financial circumstances.



FAMILY LAW. PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION. The legal issue is the misclassification of a 5.78-acre property as nonmarital, where the appellate court found that the district court erred in determining that the property was a nonmarital gift solely to the petitioner.



FAMILY LAW. ATTORNEY FEES. The appellate court reviewed the district court's denial of the respondent's request for need-based attorney fees, affirming that the decision was not an abuse of discretion given the respondent's financial capability to meet those expenses independently.



Key Phrases Spousal maintenance award. Property distribution error. Marital real property. Attorney fees determination. Nonmarital property classification.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.