Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Raphyr Lubin v. Starbucks Corporation

Date: 12-16-2024

Case Number: 30-CV01311

Judge: CEH

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Hillsborough County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Tampa Employment Lawyer Directory





Defendant's Attorney: Not Available

Description:
Tampa, Florida employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who failed a putative class action against Starbucks claiming that Starbucks sent them deficient health insurance notice under the Emploee Retirement income security Act of 1874, (ERISA), as amended by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). See 29 U.S.C. § 1166(a); 29

C.F.R. § 2590.606-4. Starbucks responded by moving to compel arbitration, citing employment agreements that Torres and Lubin's wife signed with Starbucks. Torres consented to arbitration, but Lubin opposed Starbucks's motion. Although Lubin's wife signed the employment agreement, Lubin was not a party to the agreement. This appeal requires us to determine whether Lubin must arbitrate his claims in light of his wife's employment agreement.



The district court denied Starbuck's motion to compel arbitration.



Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Raphyr Lubin v. Starbucks Corporation?

The outcome was: Affirmed

Which court heard Raphyr Lubin v. Starbucks Corporation?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Hillsborough County), FL. The presiding judge was CEH.

Who were the attorneys in Raphyr Lubin v. Starbucks Corporation?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tampa Employment Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Not Available.

When was Raphyr Lubin v. Starbucks Corporation decided?

This case was decided on December 16, 2024.