Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States ex rel. GHGH2, Inc. v. Vsoft Technologies Corporation

Date: 05-08-2026

Case Number: 3:24-cv-999

Judge: Frank D. Whitney

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

Plaintiff's Attorney: Graham Pitman and Seth Johnson

Defendant's Attorney: Not Available

Description:
Charlotte, North Carolina civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on behalf of the United States on a qui tam theory.

Reported by Kent Morlan

GNGH2 Inc. sued Vsoft Corporation claiming that it misrepresented that it was a small business with less than 300 employees on its application for a second round PPP loan of $1,259,732.00—when instead, VSoft was part of an international corporation with multiple locations worldwide, totaling well over the 300-employee limit for second round PPP loans.

This matter arose from a lawsuit filed under the qui tam or whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act, which permits private parties to file suit on behalf of the United States for false claims and share in a portion of the government’s recovery.
Outcome:
Settled for $2,291,927.07.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States ex rel. GHGH2, Inc. v. Vsoft Technologies C...?

The outcome was: Settled for $2,291,927.07.

Which court heard United States ex rel. GHGH2, Inc. v. Vsoft Technologies C...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, NC. The presiding judge was Frank D. Whitney.

Who were the attorneys in United States ex rel. GHGH2, Inc. v. Vsoft Technologies C...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Graham Pitman and Seth Johnson. Defendant's attorney: Not Available.

When was United States ex rel. GHGH2, Inc. v. Vsoft Technologies C... decided?

This case was decided on May 8, 2026.