Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Brian Lamont Turner
Date: 04-23-2026
Case Number: 3:24-cr-00008
Judge: Robert S. Ballou
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (Albemarle County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Charlottesville
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Charlottesville Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
On multiple occasions throughout 2023 and 2024, Brian Lamont Turner, 45, caused multiple adult victims to travel from the Commonwealth of Virginia to the States of North Carolina and South Carolina for the purpose of engaging in prostitution and other sexual activity.
To facilitate these activities, Turner posted commercial sex advertisements online, booked hotel rooms where the women stayed and engaged in commercial sex, and communicated with customers to set-up commercial sex “dates.” Turner received some, if not all, of the commercial sex proceeds.
In addition, Turned posted hundreds of commercial sex advertisements for the eight identified adult victims in this case between October 2018 and January 2024, for which he financially profited.
Additionally, all the identified victims in this case suffered from some form of drug addiction, an addiction that was fueled by drugs supplied by Turner.
First Assistant United States Attorney Robert N. Tracci and Ian Kaufmann, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Richmond Division made the announcement.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated the case.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sean Welsh and Keith Parrella prosecuted the case for the United States.
18 U.S. Code § 2421 provides:
(a) In General.—
Whoever knowingly transports any individual in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, with intent that such individual engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
(b) Requests To Prosecute Violations by State Attorneys General.—
(1) In general.—
The Attorney General shall grant a request by a State attorney general that a State or local attorney be cross designated to prosecute a violation of this section unless the Attorney General determines that granting the request would undermine the administration of justice.
(2) Reason for denial.—
If the Attorney General denies a request under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall submit to the State attorney general a detailed reason for the denial not later than 60 days after the date on which a request is received.
* * *
The Mann Act (1910), or White-Slave Traffic Act, is a U.S. federal law prohibiting the interstate transportation of individuals for prostitution, debauchery, or "immoral purposes". Originally targeting forced prostitution, it was historically used to prosecute consensual relationships and interracial couples, but now primarily tackles sex trafficking, particularly involving minors.
Key Aspects of the Mann Act:
Purpose: Enacted during the Progressive Era to combat "white slavery" (forced sex trafficking), it prohibits transporting anyone across state lines for sexual acts considered criminal, specifically prostitution.
"Immoral Purpose" Clause: Early, vague language regarding "any other immoral purpose" allowed authorities to prosecute consensual premarital or extramarital sex.
History & Evolution:
1910: Passed as the White-Slave Traffic Act.
1913: Famous for the conviction of Black boxer Jack Johnson, who was targeted for traveling with his white girlfriend.
1978 & 1986 Amendments: Strengthened protections for minors and updated the law to be gender-neutral.
Modern Application: Now used by the FBI/Department of Justice to combat human trafficking and prostitution.
Modern Scope: Amendments in 1986 narrowed the focus to illegal sexual acts, ending its use in prosecuting consensual, lawful adult relationships.
The act is codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421–2424.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Brian Lamont Turner?
The outcome was: CBOP: 96 months. The term consists of 60 months on count 5 and 96 months on count 7, to be served concurrently. This term is to be served consecutively to the orders of contempt previously imposed by the Court and run concurrently to the defendants term(s) of imprisonment in Henrico County Circuit Court, case numbers CR24-2192 through CR24-2203, CR24-2204 through 2210, CR25-257, and CR25-2202; SA $200.00; Fine Waived. * * * The Mann Act (1910), or White-Slave Traffic Act, is a U.S. federal law prohibiting the interstate transportation of individuals for prostitution, debauchery, or "immoral purposes". Originally targeting forced prostitution, it was historically used to prosecute consensual relationships and interracial couples, but now primarily tackles sex trafficking, particularly involving minors. Key Aspects of the Mann Act: Purpose: Enacted during the Progressive Era to combat "white slavery" (forced sex trafficking), it prohibits transporting anyone across state lines for sexual acts considered criminal, specifically prostitution. "Immoral Purpose" Clause: Early, vague language regarding "any other immoral purpose" allowed authorities to prosecute consensual premarital or extramarital sex. History & Evolution: 1910: Passed as the White-Slave Traffic Act. 1913: Famous for the conviction of Black boxer Jack Johnson, who was targeted for traveling with his white girlfriend. 1978 & 1986 Amendments: Strengthened protections for minors and updated the law to be gender-neutral. Modern Application: Now used by the FBI/Department of Justice to combat human trafficking and prostitution. Modern Scope: Amendments in 1986 narrowed the focus to illegal sexual acts, ending its use in prosecuting consensual, lawful adult relationships. The act is codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421–2424.
Which court heard United States of America v. Brian Lamont Turner?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (Albemarle County), VA. The presiding judge was Robert S. Ballou.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Brian Lamont Turner?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Charlottesville. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Charlottesville Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Brian Lamont Turner decided?
This case was decided on April 23, 2026.