Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Moms for Liberty - Wilson County, Tennessee, et al. Wilson Coounty Schools, et al.
Date: 09-15-2025
Case Number: 3:23-CV-211
Judge: Eli J. Richardson
Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Davidson County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Nashville Civil Rights Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Nashville Insurance Defense Lawyer Directory
Description:
Nashville, Tennessee Civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs First Amendment violation.
The Wilson County Board of Education is charged with administering public schools in
Wilson County, Tennessee. In line with its Policy Manual, the Board holds monthly school
board meetings. Tennessee law dictates that the Board's Chair preside over all school board
meetings, Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-205(a)(1), and that, absent state or constitutional law
instructing otherwise, those meetings shall be open to the public, id. § 8-44-102(a).
The Board routinely hears public comment during its meetings. To provide public
comment, individuals must comply with Policy 1.404, which specifies that "[a]ny matter relating
to the operation of the school system may be appealed to the Board.†R. 17-4, Ex. B, PageID
131. However, to facilitate settlement of all matters "at the lowest level of responsibility,†the
Board "will not hear complaints or concerns which have not advanced through the proper
administrative procedure from the point of origin.†Id. "If all [the] steps of the administrative
procedure have been pursued and there is still a desire to appeal to the Board, the matter shall be
referred in writing to the office of the Director of Schools and the Board shall determine whether
to hear the appeal.†Id.
Policy 1.404 also dictates how the Board determines whether to hear public comments
and provides three avenues through which a member of the public may address the Board. The
first avenue permits a person "desiring to appear before the Board [to] . . . submit a written
request with descriptive materials to the office of the Director of Schools ten (10) working days
before the scheduled regular [s]chool [b]oard meeting.†Id. "If the request is approved,†an item
will be placed on the Board's meeting agenda and the person will be allotted time to speak. Id.
The second avenue permits a would-be speaker wishing to provide comment on a topic already
on the agenda to "sign up . . . or make a request to any Board Member before the beginning of
[any] Board [m]eeting†after the agenda is published. Id. The third and final avenue allows the
Chair or another Board Member to recognize a person "for remarks to the Board [on a non
agenda item] if he/she determines that such is in the public interest.†Id. This public-interest
provision applies only to speakers who failed to meet the requirements of the first two avenues
for addressing the Board. Regardless of the avenue pursued, Policy 1.404 also requires each
speaker to state his or her name and address when speaking to the Board.
At the beginning of each public comment period, the Chair reads aloud from a script that
includes additional rules for addressing the Board. Generally, the Chair also offers to reread the
script before each speaker addresses the Board. The iteration of the script at issue here stated:
Please state your name, address, and subject of your presentation. Your topic
must be specific in nature dealing with only policies and procedures. We reserve
the right to terminate remarks at any time if you fail to adhere to the guidelines or
[if] your comments become abusive to an individual [B]oard [M]ember[,] the
[B]oard as a whole[,] . . . the [D]irector of [S]chools[,] or any employee of the
school system. . . . At the conclusion of your remarks, the [B]oard and the
Director of Schools shall have the privilege to ask questions.
Neither Policy 1.404 nor any other formal Board policy contains the
restriction on abusive comments included in the Chair's script.
The Wilson County Board of Education is charged with administering public schools in
Wilson County, Tennessee. In line with its Policy Manual, the Board holds monthly school
board meetings. Tennessee law dictates that the Board's Chair preside over all school board
meetings, Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-205(a)(1), and that, absent state or constitutional law
instructing otherwise, those meetings shall be open to the public, id. § 8-44-102(a).
The Board routinely hears public comment during its meetings. To provide public
comment, individuals must comply with Policy 1.404, which specifies that "[a]ny matter relating
to the operation of the school system may be appealed to the Board.†R. 17-4, Ex. B, PageID
131. However, to facilitate settlement of all matters "at the lowest level of responsibility,†the
Board "will not hear complaints or concerns which have not advanced through the proper
administrative procedure from the point of origin.†Id. "If all [the] steps of the administrative
procedure have been pursued and there is still a desire to appeal to the Board, the matter shall be
referred in writing to the office of the Director of Schools and the Board shall determine whether
to hear the appeal.†Id.
Policy 1.404 also dictates how the Board determines whether to hear public comments
and provides three avenues through which a member of the public may address the Board. The
first avenue permits a person "desiring to appear before the Board [to] . . . submit a written
request with descriptive materials to the office of the Director of Schools ten (10) working days
before the scheduled regular [s]chool [b]oard meeting.†Id. "If the request is approved,†an item
will be placed on the Board's meeting agenda and the person will be allotted time to speak. Id.
The second avenue permits a would-be speaker wishing to provide comment on a topic already
on the agenda to "sign up . . . or make a request to any Board Member before the beginning of
[any] Board [m]eeting†after the agenda is published. Id. The third and final avenue allows the
Chair or another Board Member to recognize a person "for remarks to the Board [on a non
agenda item] if he/she determines that such is in the public interest.†Id. This public-interest
provision applies only to speakers who failed to meet the requirements of the first two avenues
for addressing the Board. Regardless of the avenue pursued, Policy 1.404 also requires each
speaker to state his or her name and address when speaking to the Board.
At the beginning of each public comment period, the Chair reads aloud from a script that
includes additional rules for addressing the Board. Generally, the Chair also offers to reread the
script before each speaker addresses the Board. The iteration of the script at issue here stated:
Please state your name, address, and subject of your presentation. Your topic
must be specific in nature dealing with only policies and procedures. We reserve
the right to terminate remarks at any time if you fail to adhere to the guidelines or
[if] your comments become abusive to an individual [B]oard [M]ember[,] the
[B]oard as a whole[,] . . . the [D]irector of [S]chools[,] or any employee of the
school system. . . . At the conclusion of your remarks, the [B]oard and the
Director of Schools shall have the privilege to ask questions.
Neither Policy 1.404 nor any other formal Board policy contains the
restriction on abusive comments included in the Chair's script.
Outcome:
Preliminary injunction denied.
Affirmed
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Moms for Liberty - Wilson County, Tennessee, et al. Wilso...?
The outcome was: Preliminary injunction denied. Affirmed
Which court heard Moms for Liberty - Wilson County, Tennessee, et al. Wilso...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Davidson County), TN. The presiding judge was Eli J. Richardson.
Who were the attorneys in Moms for Liberty - Wilson County, Tennessee, et al. Wilso...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Nashville Civil Rights Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Nashville Insurance Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was Moms for Liberty - Wilson County, Tennessee, et al. Wilso... decided?
This case was decided on September 15, 2025.