Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Margarito Gudino, et al. v. Terrance McElrath, et al.
Date: 09-07-2023
Case Number: 3:23-cv-00143
Judge: Judge D. P. Marshall Jr.
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (Pulaski County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Bobby Martin
Defendant's Attorney: Jerry Joe Sallings
Description:
Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories.
"Arkansas is a modified comparative negligence state. This means that if you are injured in an auto accident and you are found to be at least 50% at fault for the accident, you will not be able to recover any damages from the other driver. However, if you are found to be less than 50% at fault, you can still recover damages, but your award will be reduced by your percentage of fault.
For example, if you are found to be 20% at fault for an accident and you suffer $10,000 in damages, your award will be reduced by $2,000 (20% of $10,000), so you will only recover $8,000.
In order to recover damages in an auto accident in Arkansas, you must prove that the other driver was negligent. Negligence is defined as the failure to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances.
There are four elements that must be proven in order to establish negligence:
The defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff.
The defendant breached that duty.
The plaintiff suffered an injury.
The defendant's breach of duty caused the plaintiff's injury.
The defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances. This duty is based on the concept of foreseeability. If the defendant could reasonably foresee that their actions could cause harm to the plaintiff, then they owed a legal duty to the plaintiff to take reasonable steps to prevent that harm.
The defendant breached their duty by failing to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances. This breach of duty can be intentional or unintentional. For example, if a driver is texting while driving and they cause an accident, they have intentionally breached their duty to the other driver. However, if a driver falls asleep at the wheel and they cause an accident, they have unintentionally breached their duty to the other driver.
The plaintiff suffered an injury. This injury can be physical, emotional, or financial. For example, if a driver is injured in an accident and they need surgery, they have suffered a physical injury. If a driver is injured in an accident and they experience anxiety or depression, they have suffered an emotional injury. If a driver is injured in an accident and they lose their job, they have suffered a financial injury.
The defendant's breach of duty caused the plaintiff's injury. This means that the plaintiff's injury would not have occurred if the defendant had not breached their duty. For example, if a driver is texting while driving and they cause an accident, the accident would not have occurred if the driver had not been texting.
If you have been injured in an auto accident in Arkansas, you should speak to an attorney to discuss your legal options. An attorney can help you determine if you have a case and can help you file a claim for damages."
Google Bard
"Arkansas is a modified comparative negligence state. This means that if you are injured in an auto accident and you are found to be at least 50% at fault for the accident, you will not be able to recover any damages from the other driver. However, if you are found to be less than 50% at fault, you can still recover damages, but your award will be reduced by your percentage of fault.
For example, if you are found to be 20% at fault for an accident and you suffer $10,000 in damages, your award will be reduced by $2,000 (20% of $10,000), so you will only recover $8,000.
In order to recover damages in an auto accident in Arkansas, you must prove that the other driver was negligent. Negligence is defined as the failure to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances.
There are four elements that must be proven in order to establish negligence:
The defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff.
The defendant breached that duty.
The plaintiff suffered an injury.
The defendant's breach of duty caused the plaintiff's injury.
The defendant owed a legal duty to the plaintiff to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances. This duty is based on the concept of foreseeability. If the defendant could reasonably foresee that their actions could cause harm to the plaintiff, then they owed a legal duty to the plaintiff to take reasonable steps to prevent that harm.
The defendant breached their duty by failing to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances. This breach of duty can be intentional or unintentional. For example, if a driver is texting while driving and they cause an accident, they have intentionally breached their duty to the other driver. However, if a driver falls asleep at the wheel and they cause an accident, they have unintentionally breached their duty to the other driver.
The plaintiff suffered an injury. This injury can be physical, emotional, or financial. For example, if a driver is injured in an accident and they need surgery, they have suffered a physical injury. If a driver is injured in an accident and they experience anxiety or depression, they have suffered an emotional injury. If a driver is injured in an accident and they lose their job, they have suffered a financial injury.
The defendant's breach of duty caused the plaintiff's injury. This means that the plaintiff's injury would not have occurred if the defendant had not breached their duty. For example, if a driver is texting while driving and they cause an accident, the accident would not have occurred if the driver had not been texting.
If you have been injured in an auto accident in Arkansas, you should speak to an attorney to discuss your legal options. An attorney can help you determine if you have a case and can help you file a claim for damages."
Google Bard
Outcome:
The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction until 6 November 2023 to enforce the parties' settlement agreement.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Margarito Gudino, et al. v. Terrance McElrath, et al.?
The outcome was: The complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction until 6 November 2023 to enforce the parties' settlement agreement.
Which court heard Margarito Gudino, et al. v. Terrance McElrath, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (Pulaski County), AR. The presiding judge was Judge D. P. Marshall Jr..
Who were the attorneys in Margarito Gudino, et al. v. Terrance McElrath, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Bobby Martin. Defendant's attorney: Jerry Joe Sallings.
When was Margarito Gudino, et al. v. Terrance McElrath, et al. decided?
This case was decided on September 7, 2023.