Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America, et al. v. Heal 360 Urgent Care PLLC, Heal 360 Primary Care PLLC, and Dr. Mohammed Amer Mohiuddin
Date: 10-08-2026
Case Number: 3:22-cv-01333
Judge: Reed O'Connor
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Najib Hossain Gazi and Richard J Guiltina for the United States of America
Caitlyn Silhan, Charles Siegel, and Gerald Robinson
Defendant's Attorney: Not Available
Heal 360 Urgent Care PLLC, Heal 360 Primary Care PLLC (together “Heal 360”) and Dr. Mohammed Amer Mohiuddin knew that appropriate CPT Codes for services provided at the COVID test sites were specimen collection codes, but nevertheless submitted claims under CPT Codes for Higher Level E/M Services that were reimbursed at substantially higher rates than reimbursements for specimen collection.
In order to create the appearance that Higher Level E/M Services were being performed, Heal 360 and Mohiuddin created fictitious, template-generated medical records to correspond to the dates of service for testing that made it appear as if E/M services occurred, for example by including sections for “past medical history” and “examination.” The charts were generated by remote scribes located overseas who input information collected at the COVID test sites into the records. Although Mohiuddin did not visit or treat patients at the COVID tests sites, he was listed on the majority of the claims as the rendering physician. Heal 360 and Mohiuddin submitted hundreds of thousands of claims by the Heal 360 entities to the Uninsured Program for Higher Level E/M Services, and as a result received payment to which they were not entitled.
The United States contended that during the PHE, under Mohiuddin’s oversight and direction, the Heal 360 entities operated and provided services at dozens of COVID-19 testing sites in Texas, the vast majority of which were walk up or drive through testing sites (the “COVID test sites”). Patients could register online or at the site to receive a COVID-19 test, and at the COVID test sites, patients remained in their vehicles while Heal 360 staff checked them in and performed specimen collection services through nasal swabs for COVID-19 tests. No other medical treatment was rendered.
The civil claims settled by the agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of civil liability.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America, et al. v. Heal 360 Urgent Care ...?
The outcome was: Settled for $20 million. The civil claims settled by the agreement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of civil liability.
Which court heard United States of America, et al. v. Heal 360 Urgent Care ...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas County), TX. The presiding judge was Reed O'Connor.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America, et al. v. Heal 360 Urgent Care ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Najib Hossain Gazi and Richard J Guiltina for the United States of America Caitlyn Silhan, Charles Siegel, and Gerald Robinson. Defendant's attorney: Not Available.
When was United States of America, et al. v. Heal 360 Urgent Care ... decided?
This case was decided on October 8, 2026.