Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Amy Smith v. Social Security Administration
Date: 08-25-2022
Case Number: 3:20-cv-00239
Judge: McCann King
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Montgomery* County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: John J. Stark and Rachel Julis
Description:
Dayton, Ohio social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for benefits by HHS.
This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The Parties' Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees in the amount of $3,450.00.
2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel; and
3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
This cause coming before the Court on the joint motion of the parties, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The Parties' Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees in the amount of $3,450.00.
2. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether or not Plaintiff owes a preexisting debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel; and
3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
Outcome:
It is so ordered.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Amy Smith v. Social Security Administration?
The outcome was: It is so ordered.
Which court heard Amy Smith v. Social Security Administration?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Montgomery* County), OH. The presiding judge was McCann King.
Who were the attorneys in Amy Smith v. Social Security Administration?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Dayton Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: John J. Stark and Rachel Julis.
When was Amy Smith v. Social Security Administration decided?
This case was decided on August 25, 2022.