Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
Date: 02-16-2024
Case Number: 3:19-cv-00086
Judge: Michael H. Simon
Court: United States District Court for the District of Oregon (Multnomah County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Portland Trade Mark Infringement Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Portland, Oregon trademark infringement violation claim defense lawyer represented the Defendant
"The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., was enacted by Congress in 1946. The Act provides for a national system of trademark registration and protects the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of similar marks if such use is likely to result in consumer confusion, or if the dilution of a famous mark is likely to occur. "
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lanham_act
About This Case
What was the outcome of Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Cor...?
The outcome was: JUDGMENT - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Lattice Semiconductor Corporation against all Plaintiffs. Signed on 2/16/2024 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) (Entered: 02/16/2024)
Which court heard Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Cor...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Oregon (Multnomah County), OR. The presiding judge was Michael H. Simon.
Who were the attorneys in Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Cor...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Portland Trade Mark Infringement Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Portland, Oregon trademark infringement violation claim defense lawyer represented the Defendant.
When was Steven A.W. De Jaray, et al. v. Lattice Semiconductor Cor... decided?
This case was decided on February 16, 2024.