Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Mersy Sisa v. Four Leaves Nails & Spa, Inc., et al. Morelaw Internet Marketing for Legal Professionals MoreLaw Will Make Your Phone Ring $0 to $1000+ Per Month - No Contract 888-354-4529

Date: 04-16-2018

Case Number: 3:16-cv-01662-DFM

Judge: Donna F. Martinez

Court: United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Laura Rodriguez, Louis Pechman, William G. Madsen and Magdalena B. Wiktor

Defendant's Attorney: Jian Hang

Description:
New Haven, CT - Mersy Sisa, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, sued Four Leaves Nails & Spa, Inc. and Andy Doe on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.
Outcome:
04/16/2018 91 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of the court's 88 order granting the joint 82 motion to approve settlement, the Clerk shall enter a judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice. So ordered.

Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 4/16/2018. (Greenspoon, L.) (Entered: 04/16/2018)

04/16/2018 92 JUDGMENT filed and entered dismissing the complaint with prejudice.



For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms

Signed by Clerk on 4/16/18.(Wood, R.) (Entered: 04/19/2018)

04/16/2018 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link:



https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey

(Wood, R.) (Entered: 04/19/2018)

Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Mersy Sisa v. Four Leaves Nails & Spa, Inc., et al. Morel...?

The outcome was: 04/16/2018 91 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In light of the court's 88 order granting the joint 82 motion to approve settlement, the Clerk shall enter a judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice. So ordered. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 4/16/2018. (Greenspoon, L.) (Entered: 04/16/2018) 04/16/2018 92 JUDGMENT filed and entered dismissing the complaint with prejudice. For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 4/16/18.(Wood, R.) (Entered: 04/19/2018) 04/16/2018 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Wood, R.) (Entered: 04/19/2018)

Which court heard Mersy Sisa v. Four Leaves Nails & Spa, Inc., et al. Morel...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven County), CT. The presiding judge was Donna F. Martinez.

Who were the attorneys in Mersy Sisa v. Four Leaves Nails & Spa, Inc., et al. Morel...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Laura Rodriguez, Louis Pechman, William G. Madsen and Magdalena B. Wiktor. Defendant's attorney: Jian Hang.

When was Mersy Sisa v. Four Leaves Nails & Spa, Inc., et al. Morel... decided?

This case was decided on April 16, 2018.