Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. v. Eliot Brisk, et al.
Date: 01-07-2025
Case Number: 2923-04641
Judge: Louis L. Nock
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, New York
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best New York City Real Property Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best New York City Real Property Lawyer Directory
Description:
New York City, New York civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a real property dispute.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis L. Nock, J.), entered August 4, 2023, awarding defendant landlord 5000 Grand, LLC a total amount of $268,911.89, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered June 15, 2023, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the landlord's motion for summary judgment on its counterclaims for unpaid real estate tax escalations (first counterclaim) and water charges (second counterclaim) as against plaintiff tenant Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. and as to liability against third-party defendant guarantor Guillermo Iglesias on the guaranty, granted so much of the tenant's cross-motion for summary judgment on its claim to recover the security deposit, and denied so much of the cross-motion as sought to dismiss the counterclaims and the landlord's third-party complaint against the guarantor and to amend the pleadings, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the judgment by the amount of statutory interest that accrued from June 1, 2016 on the tenant's claim for the return of the security deposit, to reduce the award to the landlord on its counterclaims for additional rent to those amounts that accrued on or after September 13, 2013, and to remand for further proceedings for the proper calculation of these amounts, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
* * *
Legal issue Can a landlord recover unpaid real estate tax escalations and water charges without providing notice to the tenant under the lease?
Key Phrases Unpaid real estate tax escalations. Water charges. Guarantor expressly waived notice. Six-year statute of limitations. Commingling of the security deposit.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis L. Nock, J.), entered August 4, 2023, awarding defendant landlord 5000 Grand, LLC a total amount of $268,911.89, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered June 15, 2023, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the landlord's motion for summary judgment on its counterclaims for unpaid real estate tax escalations (first counterclaim) and water charges (second counterclaim) as against plaintiff tenant Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. and as to liability against third-party defendant guarantor Guillermo Iglesias on the guaranty, granted so much of the tenant's cross-motion for summary judgment on its claim to recover the security deposit, and denied so much of the cross-motion as sought to dismiss the counterclaims and the landlord's third-party complaint against the guarantor and to amend the pleadings, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the judgment by the amount of statutory interest that accrued from June 1, 2016 on the tenant's claim for the return of the security deposit, to reduce the award to the landlord on its counterclaims for additional rent to those amounts that accrued on or after September 13, 2013, and to remand for further proceedings for the proper calculation of these amounts, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
* * *
Legal issue Can a landlord recover unpaid real estate tax escalations and water charges without providing notice to the tenant under the lease?
Key Phrases Unpaid real estate tax escalations. Water charges. Guarantor expressly waived notice. Six-year statute of limitations. Commingling of the security deposit.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. v. Eliot Brisk, et al.?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. v. Eliot Brisk, et al.?
This case was heard in Supreme Court, New York County, New York, NY. The presiding judge was Louis L. Nock.
Who were the attorneys in Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. v. Eliot Brisk, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best New York City Real Property Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best New York City Real Property Lawyer Directory.
When was Abarrotes Mixteca Corp., Inc. v. Eliot Brisk, et al. decided?
This case was decided on January 7, 2025.