Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Tanisha Burress v. Western Avenue Nissan, Inc.
Date: 10-24-2025
Case Number: 25-cv-05106
Judge: Charles P. Kocoras
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Chicago Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory
AI Overview
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. It allows prosecution for a "pattern of racketeering activity" involving at least two related criminal acts, known as "predicate acts," committed within 10 years through a criminal "enterprise". Penalties can be severe, including up to 20 years in prison, large fines, asset forfeiture, and civil penalties like treble damages.
Key provisions of the RICO Act
Enterprise:
A group of individuals associated for a common purpose, which can be a legitimate or illegitimate organization.
Pattern of racketeering activity:
Requires at least two "predicate acts" within a 10-year period, which are specific criminal offenses like murder, bribery, extortion, mail fraud, wire fraud, and drug dealing.
Conduct of the enterprise:
The defendant must have conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through this pattern of racketeering activity.
Penalties for a RICO violation
Criminal penalties:
Imprisonment for up to 20 years per count, or life depending on the underlying crime.
Fines up to $250,000 for individuals or $500,000 for organizations.
Forfeiture of any property or assets gained through the criminal activity.
Civil penalties:
Victims can bring a civil lawsuit seeking treble (triple) damages.
Pre-trial asset freeze:
The government can freeze assets before a trial to prevent them from being moved or spent.
Scope of the law
Originally aimed at mob-related crimes, RICO is broad enough to apply to any enterprise that affects interstate or foreign commerce, including legitimate businesses.
It can be used to prosecute the leaders of a criminal organization who may not have directly committed the predicate acts themselves.
10/24/2025 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Since the parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss 26 , the joint status report due 11/7/25 is stricken, and the referral is closed. Mailed notice (sxw) (Entered: 10/24/2025)
10/24/2025 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: The parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal 26 . This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (sxh, ) (Entered: 10/24/2025)
About This Case
What was the outcome of Tanisha Burress v. Western Avenue Nissan, Inc.?
The outcome was: 0/24/2025 26 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint (Mcintosh, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/24/2025) 10/24/2025 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Since the parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss 26 , the joint status report due 11/7/25 is stricken, and the referral is closed. Mailed notice (sxw) (Entered: 10/24/2025) 10/24/2025 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: The parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal 26 . This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (sxh, ) (Entered: 10/24/2025)
Which court heard Tanisha Burress v. Western Avenue Nissan, Inc.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago County), IL. The presiding judge was Charles P. Kocoras.
Who were the attorneys in Tanisha Burress v. Western Avenue Nissan, Inc.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Chicago Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory.
When was Tanisha Burress v. Western Avenue Nissan, Inc. decided?
This case was decided on October 24, 2025.