Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Mysha Jacara Reynold v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al.

Date: 06-20-2025

Case Number: 25-cv-00750

Judge: Thomas P. Barber

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Hillsborough County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Christopher Legg, Frank Kerney, Octavio Gomez

Defendant's Attorney: Charlotte Long for Trans Union



Robert Burgess and for Merrick Bank



Daniel Nicholas for Suncoast Credit Union

Rober Burgess

Description:
Tampa, Florida consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Credit Reporting Act Violation theory.



* * *



The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is a US federal law designed to promote the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies. It regulates how consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) collect, use, and share consumer information, particularly credit information. Key aspects include ensuring the accuracy of credit reports, limiting who can access them, and providing consumers with rights to access and dispute information in their reports.

Key Provisions of the FCRA:



Regulation of Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs):

The FCRA defines and regulates CRAs, which are entities that collect and report information about consumers' creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.



Permissible Purposes for Accessing Credit Reports:

The FCRA specifies the circumstances under which CRAs can provide consumer reports to third parties. Generally, access is limited to entities with a "permissible purpose," such as lenders, insurers, employers, and certain government agencies.

Consumer Rights:

The FCRA grants consumers several important rights, including:



Access to their credit reports: Consumers can request and obtain their credit reports from CRAs.



Dispute inaccurate information: Consumers can dispute information they believe is inaccurate, incomplete, or unverifiable, and CRAs must investigate and correct or delete inaccurate information.

Notification of adverse actions: If a consumer is denied credit, insurance, or employment based on information in their credit report, the user of the report must notify the consumer and provide the name and contact information of the CRA.

Fraud alerts: Consumers can place fraud alerts on their credit files to help prevent identity theft.



Accuracy and Fairness:

The FCRA mandates that CRAs follow reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of consumer information.

Time Limits on Negative Information:

The FCRA sets time limits on how long certain negative information, such as late payments and bankruptcies, can remain on a consumer's credit report.

Disclosures:

The FCRA requires CRAs to disclose certain information to consumers, such as the nature and substance of all information in their credit file.

Disputes and Investigations:

When a consumer disputes information in their credit report, the CRA must conduct a reasonable investigation and notify the consumer of the results.

Penalties for Violations:

The FCRA includes provisions for penalties for violations, which can include civil lawsuits and fines.



In essence, the FCRA aims to balance the needs of businesses that use credit information with the rights of consumers to privacy, accuracy, and fairness in the handling of their credit information.

Outcome:
06/20/2025 44 ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of the "Notice of Settlement as to Defendant, Suncoast Credit Union" (Doc. 43), this cause is hereby dismissed as to the last remaining Defendant, Suncoast Credit Union, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within 60 days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose, or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60 day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 6/20/2025. (DJH) (Entered: 06/20/2025)

06/20/2025 45 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) (Entered: 06/20/2025)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Mysha Jacara Reynold v. Equifax Information Services LLC,...?

The outcome was: 06/20/2025 44 ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of the "Notice of Settlement as to Defendant, Suncoast Credit Union" (Doc. 43), this cause is hereby dismissed as to the last remaining Defendant, Suncoast Credit Union, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within 60 days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose, or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60 day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 6/20/2025. (DJH) (Entered: 06/20/2025) 06/20/2025 45 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) (Entered: 06/20/2025)

Which court heard Mysha Jacara Reynold v. Equifax Information Services LLC,...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Hillsborough County), FL. The presiding judge was Thomas P. Barber.

Who were the attorneys in Mysha Jacara Reynold v. Equifax Information Services LLC,...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Christopher Legg, Frank Kerney, Octavio Gomez. Defendant's attorney: Charlotte Long for Trans Union Robert Burgess and for Merrick Bank Daniel Nicholas for Suncoast Credit Union Rober Burgess.

When was Mysha Jacara Reynold v. Equifax Information Services LLC,... decided?

This case was decided on June 20, 2025.