Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Mieszko Blek v. Aesculap, Inc.

Date: 12-17-2025

Case Number: 25-cv-00360

Judge: Maria A. Lanahan

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: <center><h2><a href="https://www.morelaw.com/missouri/lawyers/st.louis/employment.asp"target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best St. Louis Employment Law Directory</h2></a></font> </h2></center>

Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best St. Louis Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory

Description:

St. Louis, Missouri, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination claim.

This case was filed in the St. Louis County Circuit Court, 23SL-CC02096, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Outcome:

12/17/2025 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Case under Rule41(b), Doc. 8 , is GRANTED under Rule 41(b). Aesculap's Motion to Dismiss under Rule12(b)(6) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER OREDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice, subject to thecondition that upon refiling, Plaintiff must pay Defendant's attorneys' fees and costs incurred indefending this lawsuit to date. If plaintiff refiles, he must refile in this district. Signed by District Judge Maria A. Lanahan on December 17, 2025. (BRP) (Entered: 12/17/2025)
12/17/2025 18 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Maria A. Lanahan on 12/17/2025. (KCD) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Mieszko Blek v. Aesculap, Inc.?

The outcome was: 12/17/2025 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Case under Rule41(b), Doc. 8 , is GRANTED under Rule 41(b). Aesculap's Motion to Dismiss under Rule12(b)(6) is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER OREDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice, subject to thecondition that upon refiling, Plaintiff must pay Defendant's attorneys' fees and costs incurred indefending this lawsuit to date. If plaintiff refiles, he must refile in this district. Signed by District Judge Maria A. Lanahan on December 17, 2025. (BRP) (Entered: 12/17/2025) 12/17/2025 18 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Maria A. Lanahan on 12/17/2025. (KCD) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

Which court heard Mieszko Blek v. Aesculap, Inc.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County), MO. The presiding judge was Maria A. Lanahan.

Who were the attorneys in Mieszko Blek v. Aesculap, Inc.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best St. Louis Employment Law Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best St. Louis Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory.

When was Mieszko Blek v. Aesculap, Inc. decided?

This case was decided on December 17, 2025.