Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Sarah Genebacher v. Lee Enterprises, Incorporated, d/b/a St. Louis Post Dispatch
Date: 10-17-2025
Case Number: 25-cv-00084
Judge: Maria A. Lanahan
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Missouri Consumer Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Missouri Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory
Description:
St. Louis, Missouri, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment law violation theory.
The "Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment Act" is more commonly known as the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which restricts telemarketing and the use of automated telephone equipment. Its main provisions prohibit calls with automated or prerecorded voices to cell phones and emergency lines without prior express written consent, restrict residential telemarketing calls to between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time, and require adherence to the National Do Not Call Registry.
Key restrictions and requirements of the TCPA
Consent is required: Companies must have "prior express written consent" to make marketing calls to wireless numbers using an automated dialing system or prerecorded voice.
Automated calls: Prohibits the use of automatic dialing systems and prerecorded voice messages to make calls to emergency numbers, healthcare facilities, and cell phones without prior consent.
Time restrictions: Residential telemarketing calls are only allowed between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. in the consumer's local time zone.
Do Not Call Registry: Companies are prohibited from calling any number on the National Do Not Call Registry for telemarketing purposes.
Faxes: Prohibits sending unsolicited commercial faxes.
Caller ID: Requires telemarketers to transmit caller ID information.
Opt-out mechanisms: Requires that prerecorded telemarketing calls include a phone number for the recipient to make a "Do Not Call" request and a way to opt out of future calls.
Company-specific lists: Businesses must maintain their own do-not-call lists for customers who request not to be called again.
The "Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment Act" is more commonly known as the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which restricts telemarketing and the use of automated telephone equipment. Its main provisions prohibit calls with automated or prerecorded voices to cell phones and emergency lines without prior express written consent, restrict residential telemarketing calls to between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time, and require adherence to the National Do Not Call Registry.
Key restrictions and requirements of the TCPA
Consent is required: Companies must have "prior express written consent" to make marketing calls to wireless numbers using an automated dialing system or prerecorded voice.
Automated calls: Prohibits the use of automatic dialing systems and prerecorded voice messages to make calls to emergency numbers, healthcare facilities, and cell phones without prior consent.
Time restrictions: Residential telemarketing calls are only allowed between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. in the consumer's local time zone.
Do Not Call Registry: Companies are prohibited from calling any number on the National Do Not Call Registry for telemarketing purposes.
Faxes: Prohibits sending unsolicited commercial faxes.
Caller ID: Requires telemarketers to transmit caller ID information.
Opt-out mechanisms: Requires that prerecorded telemarketing calls include a phone number for the recipient to make a "Do Not Call" request and a way to opt out of future calls.
Company-specific lists: Businesses must maintain their own do-not-call lists for customers who request not to be called again.
Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Sarah Genebacher v. Lee Enterprises, Incorporated, d/b/a ...?
The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Sarah Genebacher v. Lee Enterprises, Incorporated, d/b/a ...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County), MO. The presiding judge was Maria A. Lanahan.
Who were the attorneys in Sarah Genebacher v. Lee Enterprises, Incorporated, d/b/a ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Missouri Consumer Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Missouri Commercial Litigation Lawyer Directory.
When was Sarah Genebacher v. Lee Enterprises, Incorporated, d/b/a ... decided?
This case was decided on October 17, 2025.