Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Mark Jackson v. G&S Auto Transport, Inc., et al.

Date: 08-22-2025

Case Number: 25-CR-636

Judge: Carl J. Barber

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Orleans Parish)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Personal Injury Lawyer Directory





Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Insurance Defense Lawyer Directory





Description:
New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sue on a truck wreck negligence theory.



Louisiana auto negligence law centers on

pure comparative fault, meaning you can recover damages even if you are at fault, but your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault. To win a negligence claim, you must prove the four elements of negligence: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Additionally, Louisiana has a no-pay, no-play statute, which requires uninsured drivers to forfeit a portion of their damages.

Pure Comparative Fault



Reduced Compensation: Unlike some states that bar recovery if you are at all at fault, Louisiana's pure comparative fault rule allows recovery regardless of your fault percentage.



Reduced by Fault: However, your compensation will be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to you. For example, if you are 20% at fault, your damages will be reduced by 20%.



Elements of Negligence

To win a negligence case, you must prove the four elements outlined in Louisiana Civil Code Article 2315:



Duty: The at-fault party owed you a duty of reasonable care.

Breach:

Causation: The breach was both the factual and legal cause of your injuries.



Police reports from the accident investigation

Statements from witnesses

Statements from the parties involved

Insurance company investigations

Outcome:
08/22/2025 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice, Jointly by Plaintiff and by Damian Flores, G&S Auto Transport, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shockley, Heather) (Entered: 08/22/2025)

08/22/2025 14 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims asserted in the above-referenced matter are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Carl J Barbier on 8/22/2025.(amj) (Entered: 08/22/2025)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Mark Jackson v. G&S Auto Transport, Inc., et al.?

The outcome was: 08/22/2025 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice, Jointly by Plaintiff and by Damian Flores, G&S Auto Transport, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shockley, Heather) (Entered: 08/22/2025) 08/22/2025 14 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims asserted in the above-referenced matter are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Carl J Barbier on 8/22/2025.(amj) (Entered: 08/22/2025)

Which court heard Mark Jackson v. G&S Auto Transport, Inc., et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Orleans Parish), LA. The presiding judge was Carl J. Barber.

Who were the attorneys in Mark Jackson v. G&S Auto Transport, Inc., et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Insurance Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was Mark Jackson v. G&S Auto Transport, Inc., et al. decided?

This case was decided on August 22, 2025.