Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Hector Ariel Ortiz-Guillen
Date: 12-19-2025
Case Number: 25-cr-00100
Judge: Steven J. McAuliffe
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Merrimack County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Concord
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Concord Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Hector Ariel Ortiz-Guillen, 26, was charged with one count of knowingly possessing a fraudulent or forged Permanent Resident card. According to the charging documents and other publicly filed documents in the case, U.S. Border Patrol encountered Ortiz-Guillen during a traffic stop on December 5, 2025. Ortiz-Guillen is a citizen of Honduras and was not legally present in the United States. During processing at the U.S. Border Patrol station, he was found to be in possession of a forged or fraudulent Legal Permanent Resident card bearing his own photograph but the alien number of a different person, among other irregularities.
The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
The charging statute provides for a sentence of up to 10 years in prison, and up to 3 years of supervised release. Ortiz-Guillen is also subject to removal from the United States. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.
The investigation was led by the United States Border Patrol. Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles L. Rombeau is prosecuting the case.
18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) provides:
(a) Whoever knowingly forges, counterfeits, alters, or falsely makes any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, or utters, uses, attempts to use, possesses, obtains, accepts, or receives any such visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, knowing it to be forged, counterfeited, altered, or falsely made, or to have been procured by means of any false claim or statement, or to have been otherwise procured by fraud or unlawfully obtained; or
Whoever, except under direction of the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or other proper officer, knowingly possesses any blank permit, or engraves, sells, brings into the United States, or has in his control or possession any plate in the likeness of a plate designed for the printing of permits, or makes any print, photograph, or impression in the likeness of any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit or other document required for entry into the United States, or has in his possession a distinctive paper which has been adopted by the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the printing of such visas, permits, or documents; or
Whoever, when applying for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit, or other document required for entry into the United States, or for admission to the United States personates another, or falsely appears in the name of a deceased individual, or evades or attempts to evade the immigration laws by appearing under an assumed or fictitious name without disclosing his true identity, or sells or otherwise disposes of, or offers to sell or otherwise dispose of, or utters, such visa, permit, or other document, to any person not authorized by law to receive such document; or
Whoever knowingly makes under oath, or as permitted under penalty of perjury under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, knowingly subscribes as true, any false statement with respect to a material fact in any application, affidavit, or other document required by the immigration laws or regulations prescribed thereunder, or knowingly presents any such application, affidavit, or other document which contains any such false statement or which fails to contain any reasonable basis in law or fact—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 25 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331 of this title)), 20 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 929(a) of this title)), 10 years (in the case of the first or second such offense, if the offense was not committed to facilitate such an act of international terrorism or a drug trafficking crime), or 15 years (in the case of any other offense), or both.
(b) Whoever uses—
(1) an identification document, knowing (or having reason to know) that the document was not issued lawfully for the use of the possessor,
(2) an identification document knowing (or having reason to know) that the document is false, or
(3) a false attestation,
for the purpose of satisfying a requirement of section 274A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Hector Ariel Ortiz-Guillen?
The outcome was: An indictment is not proof of guilt.
Which court heard United States of America v. Hector Ariel Ortiz-Guillen?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Merrimack County), NH. The presiding judge was Steven J. McAuliffe.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Hector Ariel Ortiz-Guillen?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Concord. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Concord Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Hector Ariel Ortiz-Guillen decided?
This case was decided on December 19, 2025.