Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Mary Blakley and Fred Bakley

Date: 12-29-2025

Case Number: 25-cr-00008

Judge: Gerald A. McHugh

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


Description:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and conspiracy to violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and to defraud the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Mary Blakley, 76, and Fred Blakley, 61, both of Lake Havasu City, Arizona and their business associate, Janmarie Lanzo, 66, also of Lake Havasu City. Lanzo pleaded guilty earlier this month to one count of conspiracy to violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and defraud the FDA.

Fred Blakley also pleaded guilty to an information charging him with possession of a firearm by a felon, after investigators seized more than 30 firearms and 30,000 rounds of ammunition from a garage he used. He had been previously convicted of federal charges for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine.

As detailed in court filings, Mary Blakley, who described herself as “Doctor Mary,” and Fred Blakley were the principals of a medical clinic business that charged clients throughout the United States approximately $300 — usually in cash — for conducting what the defendants described as “full body scans” using an ultrasound machine. Lanzo worked in the clinics and sold products to clients that were recommended by Mary Blakley as a result of the scans.

The defendants falsely claimed that, through the deployment of “smart chip technology” supposedly invented by Mary Blakley and installed in conventional ultrasound machines, their “full body scans” could diagnose, treat, and cure a wide variety of human diseases and medical conditions, including cancers. Mary Blakley would claim to “activate” the “smart chip” or “light it up like a Christmas tree” to detect cancer cells. She would also claim to conduct non-invasive colonoscopies, measure immune system levels, and clean out scarring or toxins from the lungs or brainstem, among other feats. All of these claims were false.

Based on the results of these “full body scans,” the defendants falsely and fraudulently prescribed various supplements, creams, and veterinary products. The defendants promoted and sold Aetheion, a product marketed as a cosmetic cream, to treat cancer, gastric hernias, and various other conditions. In fact, Mary Blakley would claim to activate a “laser” on her ultrasound machine to “drive” Aetheion cream into a patient’s body to kill cancer cells.

The defendants also promoted and sold fenbendazole to treat cancer in humans. Fenbendazole is a veterinary antiparasitic (intended for deworming horses and other animals) that is not approved for use in humans; indeed, fenbendazole packaging even warns that it should not be used in animals intended for human consumption. In addition, the defendants promoted and sold ProArgi9+, a vitamin supplement, to treat cardiovascular disease and to prevent heart attacks and strokes.

To promote their clinics and gain the trust of potential clients, the defendants made various false and misleading claims touting Mary Blakley’s background and credentials. For instance, Mary claimed that she had obtained a Ph.D. from the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden. However, she never attended the Karolinska Institutet, and in fact, has never left the United States.

To conceal their scheme, the defendants falsely claimed they were only doing research, when they actually sold products and services and refused to keep any records or documentation; used coded language, avoiding terms like “diagnose” or “prescribe” and saying “bad cells” instead of “cancer”; and disguised the nature of the clinics as a private or religious organization, requiring clients to execute membership or confidentiality agreements.

The Blakleys are scheduled to be sentenced in April. Mary Blakley faces a maximum possible term of 25 years in prison. Fred Blakley faces up to 40 years in prison. Lanzo is scheduled to be sentenced in March and faces a maximum possible term of five years in prison.

This case was investigated by FBI Philadelphia’s Newtown Square Resident Agency and the Food and Drug Administration Office of Criminal Investigations and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Ruth Mandelbaum and Paul G. Shapiro and Special Assistant United States Attorney Alexander Bowerman.
Outcome:
12/29/2025 108 Minute Entry for proceedings held before DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD A. MCHUGH in Courtroom 9B: Change of Plea Hearing as to MARY BLAKLEY, FRED BLAKLEY held on 12/19/2025. Defts sworn. Plea colloquies. Deft Mary Blakley entered plea of GUILTY as to Counts 1 and 9 of the superseding indictment. Deft Fred Blakley entered a plea of GUILTY as to Counts 1 and 9 of the superseding indictment. Presentence investigations ordered. Court Reporter: ESR.(tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

12/29/2025 109 Plea Memorandum by USA as to MARY BLAKLEY (tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

12/29/2025 110 Plea Agreement as to MARY BLAKLEY (tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

12/29/2025 111 ORDER FOR PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AS TO MARY BLAKLEY. Signed by DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD A. MCHUGH on

12/29/2025.12/29/2025 Entered and Copies E-Mailed. (tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

12/29/2025 116 Supplement Filed Under Seal as to MARY BLAKLEY (tomg) (tomg). (Entered: 12/29/2025)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Mary Blakley and Fred Bakley?

The outcome was: 12/29/2025 108 Minute Entry for proceedings held before DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD A. MCHUGH in Courtroom 9B: Change of Plea Hearing as to MARY BLAKLEY, FRED BLAKLEY held on 12/19/2025. Defts sworn. Plea colloquies. Deft Mary Blakley entered plea of GUILTY as to Counts 1 and 9 of the superseding indictment. Deft Fred Blakley entered a plea of GUILTY as to Counts 1 and 9 of the superseding indictment. Presentence investigations ordered. Court Reporter: ESR.(tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025) 12/29/2025 109 Plea Memorandum by USA as to MARY BLAKLEY (tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025) 12/29/2025 110 Plea Agreement as to MARY BLAKLEY (tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025) 12/29/2025 111 ORDER FOR PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AS TO MARY BLAKLEY. Signed by DISTRICT JUDGE GERALD A. MCHUGH on 12/29/2025.12/29/2025 Entered and Copies E-Mailed. (tomg) (Entered: 12/29/2025) 12/29/2025 116 Supplement Filed Under Seal as to MARY BLAKLEY (tomg) (tomg). (Entered: 12/29/2025)

Which court heard United States of America v. Mary Blakley and Fred Bakley?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County), PA. The presiding judge was Gerald A. McHugh.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Mary Blakley and Fred Bakley?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Mary Blakley and Fred Bakley decided?

This case was decided on December 29, 2025.