Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Jheremy N. Sanchez

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with carrying a firearm without a license, G. L. c. 269, § 10 (a.); carrying a loaded firearm without a license, G. L. c. 269, § 10 (n); and discharging a firearm within 500 feet of a building, G. L. c. 269, § 12E.



* * *



Legal issue Was the evidence sufficient to support the conviction for carrying and discharging a firearm without a license?

Headnote



CRIMINAL LAW. SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE. The case concerns the appellate review of convictions for carrying a firearm without a license, carrying a loaded firearm without a license, and discharging a firearm within 500 feet of a building, where the court evaluated whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's findings beyond a reasonable doubt.



CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. CONFRONTATION CLAUSE. The case addresses whether the admission of testimony regarding a firearms licensing database search violated the confrontation clause, considering the availability of the declarant for cross-examination.



EVIDENCE. HEARSAY. The court considered the hearsay implications of admitting testimony and results from a firearms licensing database search conducted by a non-testifying witness.



EVIDENCE. CONDITIONAL RELEVANCE. The court examined the lower court's decision to admit evidence of a Glock magazine as conditionally relevant, instructing the jury on their considerations for its relevance in relation to the crime.



EVIDENCE. FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION. The case discusses the propriety of a fingerprint analyst's testimony regarding the identification of latent prints, evaluating whether the testimony amounted to an impermissible opinion.

Key Phrases Carrying a firearm without a license. Sufficiency of the evidence. Confrontation clause. Conditional relevance determination. Fingerprint analyst's testimony.

The Defendant was found guilty.



Affirmed.