Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Moises Villalobos v. Juan Aguilar, et al.
Date: 12-27-2024
Case Number: 24-CV-10708
Judge: Sherilyn Peace Garnett
Court: United States District Court for the Central District of California (Los Angeles County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Los Angeles Civil Rights Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Not Available
Description:
Los Angeles, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an Americans With Disablities Act violation
claim.
The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADAâ€), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act (the "Unruh Actâ€), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53.
* * *
CIVIL PROCEDURE. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The court considers whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under California's Unruh Civil Rights Act accompanying a federal ADA claim, assessing the factors of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity as guided by 28 U.S.C. § 1367 and relevant Supreme Court precedent.
DISABILITY LAW. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The case involves a claim for injunctive relief under the ADA and examines related state law claims pursuant to federal court's exercise of supplemental jurisdiction.
CIVIL RIGHTS. HIGH-FREQUENCY LITIGANT DEFINITION. The court addresses the requirement for plaintiff and counsel to declare their status as "high-frequency litigants" under California law, impacting the adjudication of the Unruh Act claim.
Key Phrases Supplemental jurisdiction. Americans with Disabilities Act. Unruh Civil Rights Act. Order to Show Cause. High-frequency litigant.
claim.
The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADAâ€), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213, and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act (the "Unruh Actâ€), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53.
* * *
CIVIL PROCEDURE. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The court considers whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under California's Unruh Civil Rights Act accompanying a federal ADA claim, assessing the factors of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity as guided by 28 U.S.C. § 1367 and relevant Supreme Court precedent.
DISABILITY LAW. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The case involves a claim for injunctive relief under the ADA and examines related state law claims pursuant to federal court's exercise of supplemental jurisdiction.
CIVIL RIGHTS. HIGH-FREQUENCY LITIGANT DEFINITION. The court addresses the requirement for plaintiff and counsel to declare their status as "high-frequency litigants" under California law, impacting the adjudication of the Unruh Act claim.
Key Phrases Supplemental jurisdiction. Americans with Disabilities Act. Unruh Civil Rights Act. Order to Show Cause. High-frequency litigant.
Outcome:
Unknown
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Moises Villalobos v. Juan Aguilar, et al.?
The outcome was: Unknown
Which court heard Moises Villalobos v. Juan Aguilar, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Central District of California (Los Angeles County), CA. The presiding judge was Sherilyn Peace Garnett.
Who were the attorneys in Moises Villalobos v. Juan Aguilar, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Los Angeles Civil Rights Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Not Available.
When was Moises Villalobos v. Juan Aguilar, et al. decided?
This case was decided on December 27, 2024.