Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Billie Lane v. Kroger Limited Partnership I

Date: 06-13-2025

Case Number: 24-cv-00438

Judge: Thomas A. Varlan

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Knox County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Andrew Roberto

Defendant's Attorney: Andrew Firkins and Clint Woodfin

Description:
Knoxville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory.



In Tennessee, premises liability law holds property owners and those who control property responsible for injuries resulting from unsafe conditions. Owners have a duty to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition and to warn visitors of any known hazards. This means they must either fix dangerous conditions or provide adequate warnings to prevent injuries.

Key aspects of Tennessee premises liability law:



Duty of Care:



Property owners owe a duty of care to those who enter their property, whether they are invitees (customers, guests), licensees (social guests), or even trespassers in some cases.

Reasonable Care:



The duty of care requires owners to take reasonable steps to prevent injuries. This includes inspecting the property, repairing hazards, and providing warnings.

Dangerous Conditions:



Premises liability claims can arise from various unsafe conditions, such as slip and fall hazards, inadequate lighting, negligent security, and defective conditions on the property.



Negligence:



To succeed in a premises liability claim, the injured party (plaintiff) must prove that the property owner was negligent in their duty of care, and that this negligence directly caused their injuries.



Statute of Limitations:



Tennessee law requires premises liability claims to be filed within one year of the injury, according to legal resources.



Examples of situations that can lead to premises liability claims:



Slip and fall accidents: Falls due to wet floors, uneven surfaces, or other hazards.



Dog bites: Injuries from dangerous animals on the property.

Swimming pool accidents: Injuries due to inadequate safety measures or drowning.

Negligent security: Injuries resulting from criminal activity due to inadequate security measures.



Important considerations:



Open and Obvious Dangers:



Property owners may not be liable for injuries caused by dangers that are open and obvious to a reasonable person.

Trespassers:



The duty of care owed to trespassers is generally lower than that owed to invitees or licensees.

Legal Advice:



Premises liability cases can be complex. It is important to seek legal advice from a Tennessee premises liability attorney if you have been injured on someone else's property.





Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Billie Lane v. Kroger Limited Partnership I?

The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed.

Which court heard Billie Lane v. Kroger Limited Partnership I?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Knox County), TN. The presiding judge was Thomas A. Varlan.

Who were the attorneys in Billie Lane v. Kroger Limited Partnership I?

Plaintiff's attorney: Andrew Roberto. Defendant's attorney: Andrew Firkins and Clint Woodfin.

When was Billie Lane v. Kroger Limited Partnership I decided?

This case was decided on June 13, 2025.