Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Richard Seawright
Date: 01-15-2025
Case Number: 24-CR-150
Judge: Dan Polster
Court: The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Cuyahoga County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office in Cleveland
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Cleveland, Ohio Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory
Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Selling Firearms Without a Federal License
Ohio Man Sentenced to Prison for Selling Firearms Without a Federal License
Richard Seawright, 28, of Cleveland, pled guilty to reselling firearms he acquired legally, reselling them without a federal firearms license, and lying on paperwork that he was the actual buyer.
Seawright legally bought more than 50 firearms from around April 17, 2018, to about Dec. 12, 2022, at federally licensed dealers throughout Northeast Ohio. He admitted to lying on federal firearms transaction record forms which he completed and submitted when the firearms were purchased. The forms are a requirement of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to inform buyers about the specific restrictions on the receipt and possession of firearms. Each buyer must certify that they do not intend to transfer or sell the firearm. Seawright admitted to making the purchases with the intent to sell them to others who were not legally allowed to buy or own firearms. The practice of acquiring firearms for others who are legally prohibited from buying, owning, or possessing them is known as 'straw purchasing.'
During the investigation, law enforcement officials discovered that Seawright's purchases from the licensed firearms dealer, were in fact re-sold to others and found to have been used in multiple acts of violence. Firearms that Seawright purchased were traced to crimes using the ATF's National Integrated Ballistic Information Network, known as NIBIN. Ballistic cross analysis determined that firearms originally purchased by the defendant had multiple NIBIN connections to other shootings including one that resulted in a homicide.
This case was investigated by ATF-Cleveland and was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Margaret Kane for the Northern District of Ohio.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Richard Seawright?
The outcome was:
Which court heard United States of America v. Richard Seawright?
This case was heard in The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Cuyahoga County), OH. The presiding judge was Dan Polster.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Richard Seawright?
Plaintiff's attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office in Cleveland. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Cleveland, Ohio Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Richard Seawright decided?
This case was decided on January 15, 2025.