Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Eric Johnson, et al. v. David A. Mazie, et al.
Date: 07-11-2025
Case Number: 23-CV-3420
Judge: Robert B. Kugler
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Essex County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Bruce Nagel and Robert Solomon
Defendant's Attorney: David Mazie and Adam Slater
Description:
Newark, New Jersey personal injury class actions lawyers represented Plaintiff challenging the fees paid to class action plaintiff's lawyers.
In 2015, product liability cases concerning the blood-
pressure medication Olmesartan were consolidated into a
multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey. Adam Slater was co-lead
counsel of the MDL, and his law firm, Mazie Slater Katz &
Freeman, LLC, represented more than 200 plaintiffs. The case
settled for over $300 million, and the firm collected contingent
fees as agreed to by its clients. The firm also received
compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the
settlement's common-benefit fund.
After the MDL settled, one of the plaintiffs in that case,
Anthony Martino, filed a putative class action in New Jersey
state court against his former lawyers, David Mazie, Adam
Slater, and Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC (collectively,
Defendants). Martino alleged that Defendants received
contingent fees in violation of various New Jersey court rules
made applicable to litigation in federal court under the District
of New Jersey's local rules. On behalf of the putative class of
individuals represented by Defendants during the MDL,
Martino asserted claims for legal malpractice, conversion, and
unjust enrichment. Defendants removed the case to the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which
granted Defendants' motion to dismiss. A panel of this Court
affirmed that dismissal order in a nonprecedential opinion,
holding that Martino failed to plausibly allege a violation of
New Jersey's rules. See Martino v. Mazie, 2023 WL 1990306
(3d Cir. Feb. 14, 2023)
* * *
In 2015, product liability cases concerning the blood-
pressure medication Olmesartan were consolidated into a
multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey. Adam Slater was co-lead
counsel of the MDL, and his law firm, Mazie Slater Katz &
Freeman, LLC, represented more than 200 plaintiffs. The case
settled for over $300 million, and the firm collected contingent
fees as agreed to by its clients. The firm also received
compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the
settlement's common-benefit fund.
After the MDL settled, one of the plaintiffs in that case,
Anthony Martino, filed a putative class action in New Jersey
state court against his former lawyers, David Mazie, Adam
Slater, and Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC (collectively,
Defendants). Martino alleged that Defendants received
contingent fees in violation of various New Jersey court rules
made applicable to litigation in federal court under the District
of New Jersey's local rules. On behalf of the putative class of
individuals represented by Defendants during the MDL,
Martino asserted claims for legal malpractice, conversion, and
unjust enrichment. Defendants removed the case to the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which
granted Defendants' motion to dismiss. A panel of this Court
affirmed that dismissal order in a nonprecedential opinion,
holding that Martino failed to plausibly allege a violation of
New Jersey's rules. See Martino v. Mazie, 2023 WL 1990306
(3d Cir. Feb. 14, 2023)
* * *
Outcome:
Vacated and remanded.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Eric Johnson, et al. v. David A. Mazie, et al.?
The outcome was: Vacated and remanded.
Which court heard Eric Johnson, et al. v. David A. Mazie, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Essex County), NJ. The presiding judge was Robert B. Kugler.
Who were the attorneys in Eric Johnson, et al. v. David A. Mazie, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Bruce Nagel and Robert Solomon. Defendant's attorney: David Mazie and Adam Slater.
When was Eric Johnson, et al. v. David A. Mazie, et al. decided?
This case was decided on July 11, 2025.