Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Matthew James
Date: 09-12-2025
Case Number: 23-CR-849
Judge: Joanna Seybert
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nassau County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Central Islip
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Central Islip Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Mathew James, the owner of a medical billing business that submitted insurance claims on behalf of doctors, was tried and convicted on charges of health care fraud, conspiracy to commit health care fraud, wire fraud, and aggravated identify theft. The charges stemmed from James's role in a complex scheme to defraud insurance companies by "upcoding†medical procedures, falsifying reports, directing patients to emergency rooms for pre-planned surgeries, and even impersonating patients in phone calls to the insurance companies. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
(Seybert, J.) sentenced James to 144 months' imprisonment and ordered him to forfeit $63,382,049.02 in criminal proceeds and to pay $336,996,416.85 in restitution.
Affirmed
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Matthew James?
The outcome was: James was sentenced to 12 years in prison and was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $336,996,416.85 and forfeiture of $63,382,049.02. Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Matthew James?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nassau County), NY. The presiding judge was Joanna Seybert.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Matthew James?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Central Islip. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Central Islip Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Matthew James decided?
This case was decided on September 12, 2025.