Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Terrence Wayne VanOchten

Date: 08-15-2025

Case Number: 23-CR-29

Judge: Paul Lewis Maloney

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Kent County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Grand Rapids

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Grand Rapids Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory







Description:
Grand Rapids, Michigan, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm by a drug user.



Section 922(g)(3) of Title 18 prohibits unlawful drug users from possessing firearms. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). Echoing the sentiment that drug users in possession of firearms raise heightened safety concerns, the Sentencing Guidelines instruct district courts to increase a defendant's base offense level in firearm possession cases if he is a "person described” in § 922(g)(3)—in other words, if he is an unlawful user of controlled substances and possesses firearms. U.S. Sent'g Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(a)(4)(B) (U.S. Sent'g Comm'n 2024) (hereinafter Guidelines); id. cmt. n.3.

Outcome:
Terrence Wayne VanOchten pleaded guilty to possessing three unregistered firearms (pipe bombs). Over VanOchten’s opposition, the district court increased his base

offense level on the grounds that he is a “person described” in § 922(g)(3). Id. cmt. n.3. That leaves us to resolve the constitutional question at the heart of VanOchten’s objection: whether § 922(g)(3) may be enforced against him, consistent with the Second Amendment.



Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Terrence Wayne VanOchten?

The outcome was: Terrence Wayne VanOchten pleaded guilty to possessing three unregistered firearms (pipe bombs). Over VanOchten’s opposition, the district court increased his base offense level on the grounds that he is a “person described” in § 922(g)(3). Id. cmt. n.3. That leaves us to resolve the constitutional question at the heart of VanOchten’s objection: whether § 922(g)(3) may be enforced against him, consistent with the Second Amendment. Affirmed

Which court heard United States of America v. Terrence Wayne VanOchten?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Kent County), MI. The presiding judge was Paul Lewis Maloney.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Terrence Wayne VanOchten?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Grand Rapids. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Grand Rapids Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Terrence Wayne VanOchten decided?

This case was decided on August 15, 2025.