Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Dion Daniel

Date: 01-29-2026

Case Number: 23-cr-20042

Judge: Daniel D. Crabtree

Court: United States District Court for the District of Kansas (Wyandotte County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Kansas City

Defendant's Attorney: Willis Toney

Description:
Kansas City, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bank fraud.

Dion Daniel, 36, of Kansas City, Missouri, submitted false information on applications for disaster relief loans resulting in a loss of $522,000 for the Small Business Administration (SBA). The Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") was intended to provide financial relief to business owners dealing with economic losses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In 2020, Daniel lied on multiple PPP loan applications about the number of employees and the amount of monthly payroll expenses at his two Missouri-based businesses. He submitted Internal Revenue Service (IRS) forms with the loan applications that had not been filed with the IRS.

Daniel attempted to conceal spending loan proceeds for his personal use instead of for business expenses. He wrote checks to individuals who did not work for him. After they cashed the checks, Daniel gave them part of the money and kept the rest for himself.

“Although we are now years removed from the COVID-19 pandemic, prosecutions continue of individuals who abused the Paycheck Protection Program,” said U.S. Attorney Ryan A. Kriegshauser. “To those of you who committed perjury to get government money you weren’t entitled to, don’t think because you haven’t yet faced justice that you’re in the clear. We’re federal prosecutors. We don’t overlook crimes, nor do we forget about the people who commit them.”

“When the CARES Act was enacted into law nearly six years ago, the federal government simplified the loan application process to get relief into the hands of desperate small businesses as quickly as possible. Unfortunately, fraudsters found ways to exploit the process,” said IRS-Criminal Investigation St. Louis Special Agent in Charge William Steenson. “Our special agents are experts at uncovering where funds originated and where they were spent. We’re proud to use our expertise alongside our law enforcement partners to bring accountability for hardworking taxpayers.”

The IRS-Criminal Investigation investigated the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Oakley prosecuted the case.
Outcome:
the Defendant was sentenced to 21 month is provide. As part of his sentence, Daniel must pay $552,214 in restitution.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Dion Daniel?

The outcome was: the Defendant was sentenced to 21 month is provide. As part of his sentence, Daniel must pay $552,214 in restitution.

Which court heard United States of America v. Dion Daniel?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Kansas (Wyandotte County), KS. The presiding judge was Daniel D. Crabtree.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Dion Daniel?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Kansas City. Defendant's attorney: Willis Toney.

When was United States of America v. Dion Daniel decided?

This case was decided on January 29, 2026.