Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Demarcus Greely, Omarion Brach, and Torez Burnett
Date: 07-03-2025
Case Number: 23-cr-1978, 23-cr-2042, 23-cr-2050
Judge:
Court: United States District court for the Western District of Michigan (Kent County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Grand Rapids
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Grand Rapids Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Grand Rapids, Michigan criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with felon possession of firearms.
Defendants Demarcus Greely ("Greelyâ€), Omarion Branch ("Branchâ€), and Torez Zaron Burnett ("Burnettâ€) each challenge their sentences. Greely pled guilty to unlawful possession of a machinegun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). He now argues that Section 922(o) is unconstitutional. Branch pled guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C § 922(g)(1). Similar to Greely, he argues that Section 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional. Burnett pled guilty to conspiracy to possess and transfer a machinegun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 922(o), and possession and transfer of a machinegun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). Burnett argues that Section 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional and that the district court's sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable.
Defendants Demarcus Greely ("Greelyâ€), Omarion Branch ("Branchâ€), and Torez Zaron Burnett ("Burnettâ€) each challenge their sentences. Greely pled guilty to unlawful possession of a machinegun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). He now argues that Section 922(o) is unconstitutional. Branch pled guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C § 922(g)(1). Similar to Greely, he argues that Section 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional. Burnett pled guilty to conspiracy to possess and transfer a machinegun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 922(o), and possession and transfer of a machinegun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). Burnett argues that Section 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional and that the district court's sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Demarcus Greely, Omarion Brac...?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Demarcus Greely, Omarion Brac...?
This case was heard in United States District court for the Western District of Michigan (Kent County), MI.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Demarcus Greely, Omarion Brac...?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Grand Rapids. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Grand Rapids Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Demarcus Greely, Omarion Brac... decided?
This case was decided on July 3, 2025.