Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Patrick Hugh Mitchell

Date: 09-17-2025

Case Number: 23-CR-176

Judge: CEM

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Orlando

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Orlando Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Orlando, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with selling, distributing or dispensing drugs.



Outcome:
IMPRISONMENT: 120 Months.; SUPERVISED RELEASE: 5 Years.; FINE: Waived.; SPECIAL ASSESSMENT: $100.00.



Affirmed



Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Related Cases from United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando County)
United States of America v. Avinash Singh 10/11/2025
Joseph Heid v. Mark Rutkoski and Forrest Best 07/11/2025
View More FL Cases
Florida Attorneys
Jeremy Lasnetski Jacksonville, FL
Criminal Defense
Joshua Paikowsky Miami, FL
Civil Litigation, Commercial Litigation
John O'Sullivan Miami, FL
Personal Injury
Jonathan Etra Miami, FL
Criminal Defense
Find More Florida Attorneys

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Patrick Hugh Mitchell?

The outcome was: IMPRISONMENT: 120 Months.; SUPERVISED RELEASE: 5 Years.; FINE: Waived.; SPECIAL ASSESSMENT: $100.00. Affirmed

Which court heard United States of America v. Patrick Hugh Mitchell?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando County), FL. The presiding judge was CEM.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Patrick Hugh Mitchell?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Orlando. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Orlando Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Patrick Hugh Mitchell decided?

This case was decided on September 17, 2025.