Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Maurice Smith

Date: 12-22-2025

Case Number: 23-cr-00129

Judge: William S. Stickman, IV

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Allegheny County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Pittsburgh

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best PIttsburgh Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


Description:
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

, 2025).
14 Moore, 111 F.4th at 272 (holding “that convicts may be disarmed while serving their sentences on [federal] supervised release”); Quailes, 126 F.4th 215, 217 (3d Cir. 2025) (extending Moore’s logic to “appl[y] with equal force to defendants who are on state supervised release—including a sentence of parole or probation”).
Outcome:
Motion to suppress denied.

Affirmed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Maurice Smith?

The outcome was: Motion to suppress denied. Affirmed.

Which court heard United States of America v. Maurice Smith?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Allegheny County), PA. The presiding judge was William S. Stickman, IV.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Maurice Smith?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Pittsburgh. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best PIttsburgh Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Maurice Smith decided?

This case was decided on December 22, 2025.