Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

In the Interest of J.A.B., J.H.B., and J.R.B., children and Converning G.W-V

Date: 03-13-2025

Case Number: 22JV22

Judge: Anne K. Norrdin

Court: District Court, Garfield County, Colorado

Plaintiff's Attorney: Garfield County, Colorado District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Glenwood Srpings Family Law Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Glenwood Springs, Colorado family law lawyer represented the mother in a parental termination action.



The Chaffee County Department of Human Services received a referral expressing concerns about substance use and domestic

violence. The Chaffee County Department filed a petition in dependency and neglect, and the juvenile court adjudicated the children dependent and neglected. Venue was then transferred to Garfield County.



* * *



Outcome:
The Department later moved to terminate parental rights.

Following an evidentiary hearing, the juvenile court granted the

motion and terminated mother’s parental rights.



Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of In the Interest of J.A.B., J.H.B., and J.R.B., children a...?

The outcome was: The Department later moved to terminate parental rights. Following an evidentiary hearing, the juvenile court granted the motion and terminated mother’s parental rights. Affirmed

Which court heard In the Interest of J.A.B., J.H.B., and J.R.B., children a...?

This case was heard in District Court, Garfield County, Colorado, CO. The presiding judge was Anne K. Norrdin.

Who were the attorneys in In the Interest of J.A.B., J.H.B., and J.R.B., children a...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Garfield County, Colorado District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Glenwood Srpings Family Law Law Lawyer Directory.

When was In the Interest of J.A.B., J.H.B., and J.R.B., children a... decided?

This case was decided on March 13, 2025.