Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology
Date: 08-13-2002
Case Number: 22197
Judge: Amundson
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Plaintiff's Attorney:
"_new">Robert A. Christenson, Souix Falls, South Dakota,
"_new">Jonathan K. Van Patten, Vermillion, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellant.
Defendant's Attorney:
"_new">Monte R. Walz of Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellee.
[¶23.] Affirmed in favor of Defendant.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology?
The outcome was: [¶22.] For the foregoing reasons, we do not find MRA had a duty to disclose the voting agreement to Schwaiger. Based on our holding it is unnecessary to address other issues raised on appeal. [¶23.] Affirmed in favor of Defendant.
Which court heard Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology?
This case was heard in South Dakota Supreme Court, SD. The presiding judge was Amundson.
Who were the attorneys in Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology?
Plaintiff's attorney: Robert A. Christenson, Souix Falls, South Dakota, Jonathan K. Van Patten, Vermillion, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellant.. Defendant's attorney: Monte R. Walz of Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellee..
When was Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology decided?
This case was decided on August 13, 2002.