Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Deena Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc.
Date: 12-29-2023
Case Number: 22-CV-9545
Judge: Vincent L. Briccetti
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of of New York (Manhattan County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best New York Consumer Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Not available
Description:
New York City, New York consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the defedants on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act theory.
Defendant B&G "manufactures, markets, and sells†spreads, jams, preserves, marmalades, and jellies under its Polaner brand. At issue in this case are statements on the packaging of Polaner's "All Fruit spreadable fruit†(the "Productâ€). The Product, which comes in a variety of flavors, displays on its front label the fruit contained in the spread and the words "All Fruit,†"Spreadable Fruit,†and "Sweetened Only with Fruit Juice,..."
As alleged in the complaint, the back label lists the Product's ingredients, which include a particular fruit, juice concentrates, fruit pectin, citric acid, and natural flavor.
As alleged in the complaint, the back label lists the Product's ingredients, which include a particular fruit, juice concentrates, fruit pectin, citric acid, and natural flavor.
Defendant B&G "manufactures, markets, and sells†spreads, jams, preserves, marmalades, and jellies under its Polaner brand. At issue in this case are statements on the packaging of Polaner's "All Fruit spreadable fruit†(the "Productâ€). The Product, which comes in a variety of flavors, displays on its front label the fruit contained in the spread and the words "All Fruit,†"Spreadable Fruit,†and "Sweetened Only with Fruit Juice,..."
As alleged in the complaint, the back label lists the Product's ingredients, which include a particular fruit, juice concentrates, fruit pectin, citric acid, and natural flavor.
As alleged in the complaint, the back label lists the Product's ingredients, which include a particular fruit, juice concentrates, fruit pectin, citric acid, and natural flavor.
Outcome:
Motion to dismiss granted.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Deena Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc.?
The outcome was: Motion to dismiss granted.
Which court heard Deena Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of of New York (Manhattan County), NY. The presiding judge was Vincent L. Briccetti.
Who were the attorneys in Deena Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best New York Consumer Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Not available.
When was Deena Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc. decided?
This case was decided on December 29, 2023.