Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Kevin Akinjobi v. Pegasus Steel, LLC
Date: 06-24-2025
Case Number: 22-CV-4634
Judge: Richard M Gergel
Court: United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Charleston County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Matthew King
Defendant's Attorney: Cherie Blackburn
Description:
Charleston, South Carolina labor and employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination civil rights violation theory.
* * *
42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, and other terms and conditions of employment. It also applies to employment agencies and joint labor-management committees controlling apprenticeship or other training programs.
Key provisions of 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 related to race discrimination:
Employer Responsibilities:
Employers cannot discriminate against employees or job applicants based on race in various aspects of employment. This includes:
Hiring and firing: Employers cannot refuse to hire or fire someone based on their race.
Compensation and terms/conditions of employment: Employers cannot discriminate in terms of pay, promotions, job assignments, or other aspects of the job based on race.
Limiting, segregating, or classifying employees: Employers cannot create separate work environments or opportunities based on race.
Employment Agency Practices:
Employment agencies cannot discriminate when referring individuals for employment based on race.
Training Programs:
Joint labor-management committees controlling apprenticeship or other training programs cannot discriminate based on race when admitting individuals into or employing them in such programs.
"Motivating factor" standard:
Title VII prohibits employment practices where race was a "motivating factor," even if other factors were also involved.
Affirmative Action:
While not explicitly stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, affirmative action plans may be relevant in addressing past discrimination.
E
nforcement:
\
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is the primary agency responsible for enforcing Title VII.
In essence, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 aims to ensure equal opportunity in employment and prevent discrimination based on race and other protected characteristics
* * *
42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, and other terms and conditions of employment. It also applies to employment agencies and joint labor-management committees controlling apprenticeship or other training programs.
Key provisions of 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 related to race discrimination:
Employer Responsibilities:
Employers cannot discriminate against employees or job applicants based on race in various aspects of employment. This includes:
Hiring and firing: Employers cannot refuse to hire or fire someone based on their race.
Compensation and terms/conditions of employment: Employers cannot discriminate in terms of pay, promotions, job assignments, or other aspects of the job based on race.
Limiting, segregating, or classifying employees: Employers cannot create separate work environments or opportunities based on race.
Employment Agency Practices:
Employment agencies cannot discriminate when referring individuals for employment based on race.
Training Programs:
Joint labor-management committees controlling apprenticeship or other training programs cannot discriminate based on race when admitting individuals into or employing them in such programs.
"Motivating factor" standard:
Title VII prohibits employment practices where race was a "motivating factor," even if other factors were also involved.
Affirmative Action:
While not explicitly stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, affirmative action plans may be relevant in addressing past discrimination.
E
nforcement:
\
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is the primary agency responsible for enforcing Title VII.
In essence, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 aims to ensure equal opportunity in employment and prevent discrimination based on race and other protected characteristics
Outcome:
Settled and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Kevin Akinjobi v. Pegasus Steel, LLC?
The outcome was: Settled and dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Kevin Akinjobi v. Pegasus Steel, LLC?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (Charleston County), SC. The presiding judge was Richard M Gergel.
Who were the attorneys in Kevin Akinjobi v. Pegasus Steel, LLC?
Plaintiff's attorney: Matthew King. Defendant's attorney: Cherie Blackburn.
When was Kevin Akinjobi v. Pegasus Steel, LLC decided?
This case was decided on June 24, 2025.