Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Curtis L. Walker v. Dan Cromwell
Date: 06-16-2025
Case Number: 22-CV-311
Judge: William M. Conley
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (Dane County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Stphen Krsacok
Defendant's Attorney: Wisconsin Department of Justice_habeas actions
Description:
Madison, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking postconviction relief.
Curtis Walker has served 30 years of his life sentence for a murder that he committed when
he was 17 years old. The state trial judge in Walker's case exercised the discretion conferred upon him by Wisconsin law
to set Walker's parole eligibility date for 2071. Walker will notbe eligible for release until he is 95 years old.
Almost two decades after Walker was sentenced, the Supreme Court began deciding a series of cases involving
juvenile offenders who were sentenced to life without parole. Relying on those decisions, Walker sought postconviction
relief in the Wisconsin state courts. After the state courts denied relief, Walker filed a petition for federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 arguing that he is serving a defacto life-without-parole sentence that violates the Eighth Amendment. He requests a "meaningful opportunity†to demonstrate that he is no longer dangerous and that he is
capable of reintegrating into the community. Given the deferential standard of review we apply under section
2254(d), we affirm the district court's denial of federal habeas relief. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals did not unreasonably apply the Supreme Court's case law, which offers mixed signals on cases like Walker's, where a juvenile homicide offender is sentenced to life without parole as a matter of judicial judgment and discretion.
In 1994, Curtis Walker and an accomplice shot and killed Milwaukee police officer William Robertson, an officer they
selected at random for murder. Walker was 17 years old at the time of the crime. He was tried as an adult in a Wisconsin state court and was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide while using a dangerous weapon, as a party to the crime. Dur- ing Walker's sentencing hearing, the judge considered Walker's difficult childhood and capacity for rehabilitation before concluding that a lengthy prison sentence was warranted. The judge sentenced Walker to life in prison with a parole eligibility date of 2071.
Curtis Walker has served 30 years of his life sentence for a murder that he committed when
he was 17 years old. The state trial judge in Walker's case exercised the discretion conferred upon him by Wisconsin law
to set Walker's parole eligibility date for 2071. Walker will notbe eligible for release until he is 95 years old.
Almost two decades after Walker was sentenced, the Supreme Court began deciding a series of cases involving
juvenile offenders who were sentenced to life without parole. Relying on those decisions, Walker sought postconviction
relief in the Wisconsin state courts. After the state courts denied relief, Walker filed a petition for federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 arguing that he is serving a defacto life-without-parole sentence that violates the Eighth Amendment. He requests a "meaningful opportunity†to demonstrate that he is no longer dangerous and that he is
capable of reintegrating into the community. Given the deferential standard of review we apply under section
2254(d), we affirm the district court's denial of federal habeas relief. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals did not unreasonably apply the Supreme Court's case law, which offers mixed signals on cases like Walker's, where a juvenile homicide offender is sentenced to life without parole as a matter of judicial judgment and discretion.
In 1994, Curtis Walker and an accomplice shot and killed Milwaukee police officer William Robertson, an officer they
selected at random for murder. Walker was 17 years old at the time of the crime. He was tried as an adult in a Wisconsin state court and was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide while using a dangerous weapon, as a party to the crime. Dur- ing Walker's sentencing hearing, the judge considered Walker's difficult childhood and capacity for rehabilitation before concluding that a lengthy prison sentence was warranted. The judge sentenced Walker to life in prison with a parole eligibility date of 2071.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Curtis L. Walker v. Dan Cromwell?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard Curtis L. Walker v. Dan Cromwell?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (Dane County), WI. The presiding judge was William M. Conley.
Who were the attorneys in Curtis L. Walker v. Dan Cromwell?
Plaintiff's attorney: Stphen Krsacok. Defendant's attorney: Wisconsin Department of Justice_habeas actions.
When was Curtis L. Walker v. Dan Cromwell decided?
This case was decided on June 16, 2025.