Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Jacob Scheibe v. Prosupps USA, LLC
Date: 07-08-2025
Case Number: 22-CV-1784
Judge: Roger T. Benitez
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of California (San Diego County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Charles Weller
Defendant's Attorney: Jaikaran Singh and Jesscia Walker
Description:
San Diego, California consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking class action certification against ProSupps USA under California consumer protection laws for mislabeling a dietary supplement named Hydro BCAA.
Plaintiff alleged that Hydro BCAA was mislabeled because his preliminary testing found that the supplement contained more grams of carbohydrates and calories than was listed on the supplement's FDA-prescribed label. Plaintiff alleged he tested the supplement using the FDA's testing methods, but not the FDA's twelve-sample sampling process. The district court found that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempted the claims because plaintiff failed to plead that he tested the supplement according to the FDA's sampling process.
The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempts state laws imposing labeling requirements that are not identical to those
of the Act. Consumers can bring claims under state law alleging that foods are mislabeled, but those claims cannot
impose liability beyond what the Act requires. If a product's label complies with the Act, then the Act preempts any state-law claim that the product is mislabeled.
Plaintiff alleged that Hydro BCAA was mislabeled because his preliminary testing found that the supplement contained more grams of carbohydrates and calories than was listed on the supplement's FDA-prescribed label. Plaintiff alleged he tested the supplement using the FDA's testing methods, but not the FDA's twelve-sample sampling process. The district court found that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempted the claims because plaintiff failed to plead that he tested the supplement according to the FDA's sampling process.
The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempts state laws imposing labeling requirements that are not identical to those
of the Act. Consumers can bring claims under state law alleging that foods are mislabeled, but those claims cannot
impose liability beyond what the Act requires. If a product's label complies with the Act, then the Act preempts any state-law claim that the product is mislabeled.
Outcome:
Motion of dismiss granted.
Reversed
Reversed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Jacob Scheibe v. Prosupps USA, LLC?
The outcome was: Motion of dismiss granted. Reversed
Which court heard Jacob Scheibe v. Prosupps USA, LLC?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of California (San Diego County), CA. The presiding judge was Roger T. Benitez.
Who were the attorneys in Jacob Scheibe v. Prosupps USA, LLC?
Plaintiff's attorney: Charles Weller. Defendant's attorney: Jaikaran Singh and Jesscia Walker.
When was Jacob Scheibe v. Prosupps USA, LLC decided?
This case was decided on July 8, 2025.