Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Alin Pop v. Lulifama.com, LLC, et al.
Date: 08-08-2025
Case Number: 22-cv-02698
Judge: Not Available
Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Hillsborough County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Tampa Consumer Law Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Tampa Consumer Law Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Tampa, Florida consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPAâ€) violation theories.
In his complaint, Pop alleged that he purchased Luli Fama swimwear after seeing various social media influencers, whom Pop also named as defendants, wearing the swimwear and tagging Luli Fama in Instagram posts. At the time of his purchase, Pop believed that the influencers were giving their unpaid endorsements of the Luli Fama products. As it turned out, however, Pop was mistaken; Luli Fama was actually paying the influencers for their endorsements. And Pop's mistake stemmed from the fact that neither Luli Fama nor the influencers disclosed the payments. Pop alleged that failing to disclose the payments violated FDUTPA, which generally prohibits, as relevant here, "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.†Fla. Stat. § 501.204(1).
In his complaint, Pop alleged that he purchased Luli Fama swimwear after seeing various social media influencers, whom Pop also named as defendants, wearing the swimwear and tagging Luli Fama in Instagram posts. At the time of his purchase, Pop believed that the influencers were giving their unpaid endorsements of the Luli Fama products. As it turned out, however, Pop was mistaken; Luli Fama was actually paying the influencers for their endorsements. And Pop's mistake stemmed from the fact that neither Luli Fama nor the influencers disclosed the payments. Pop alleged that failing to disclose the payments violated FDUTPA, which generally prohibits, as relevant here, "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce.†Fla. Stat. § 501.204(1).
Outcome:
Dismissed.
Affirmed
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Alin Pop v. Lulifama.com, LLC, et al.?
The outcome was: Dismissed. Affirmed
Which court heard Alin Pop v. Lulifama.com, LLC, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Hillsborough County), FL. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in Alin Pop v. Lulifama.com, LLC, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tampa Consumer Law Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tampa Consumer Law Law Lawyer Directory.
When was Alin Pop v. Lulifama.com, LLC, et al. decided?
This case was decided on August 8, 2025.