Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Wesley Guard
Date: 09-10-2025
Case Number: 22-cr-00105
Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Albany County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Albany
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Albany Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Kik is a messaging application available for download on most mobile
phones.5 It "allows users to chat with one another one-on-one or in a group
setting, [either in a] private or public group.†App'x at 315. It also allows users
to share images and videos.
NCMEC "is an entity organized as a private nonprofit but established by
Congress and statutorily obliged to operate the official national clearinghouse for
information about missing and exploited children.†United States v. Maher, 120
F.4th 297, 302 n.5 (2d Cir. 2024) (citations and quotation marks omitted); see also
34 U.S.C. §11293(b)(1)(B). As part of its statutory mandate, NCMEC "work[s]
with families, law enforcement agencies, electronic service providers, . . .
technology companies, . . . and others . . . to reduce the existence and distribution
of online images and videos of sexually exploited children.†34 U.S.C.
§11293(b)(1)(K). It operates a "CyberTipline†that invites members of the public
and electronic service providers ("ESPsâ€) to report online child pornography.2
Kik uses a software program developed by Microsoft "to identify known
the same images of child pornography that may come across [its] servers through user
accounts.†App'x at 70; see also Hany Farid, Reining In Online Abuses, 19 Tech. &
Innovation 593, 596 (2018). The program, called PhotoDNA, relies on "hashingâ€
technology to identify known images of CSAM. App'x at 122. When an image is
uploaded to Kik, PhotoDNA automatically assigns it "a specific alphanumeric
number, known as a hash I.D.†or "hash value.†App'x at 318. The hash value
"serves to identify an individual digital file as a kind of 'digital fingerprint.'â€
App'x at 70 n.1 (quoting United States v. Wellman, 663 F.3d 224, 226 n.2 (4th Cir.
2011)). PhotoDNA's "database is populated with hash values provided by
NCMEC of known images of child pornography.†App'x at 70. When an image
is assigned a hash value, that value is "matched against a repository provided by
NCMEC and if . . . that [hash value] is identified with something in NCMEC's
repository, that's how†Kik identifies it as CSAM.
When PhotoDNA "identif[ies] contraband†on Kik, a designated Kik
employee personally reviews the file. App'x at 347-48. If the designated
employee confirms the file to be suspected child pornography, "he makes a
report to NCMEC.†App'x at 348. The file is "taken off the public platform
immediately†but at that time, it "is still in the user account.†App'x at 349-50.
The contraband ï¬le is retained by Kik "on the private side of†the system for 90
days for purposes of preservation of evidence.
The ï¬le is also sent to NCMEC, along with "[s]ubscriber data information
. . . and activity logs†for the user whose account contained the ï¬le. App'x at
319.3 This reporting is mandatory; the law requires an ESP to report suspected
CSAM to NCMEC if the ESP has "actual knowledge†that such material resides
on its platform. See 18 U.S.C. §2258A(a)(1)(A)(i), (B). Once the PhotoDNA
program returns a match and the designated employee reviews the ï¬le, Kik has
such actual knowledge and must report to NCMEC. Failure to report a ï¬le
containing CSAM of which the ESP has actual knowledge can be punished by a
ï¬ne of up to $850,000 for the ï¬rst failure and $1,000,000 for any subsequent
failure. See id. §2258A(e). The law does not, however, "require a provider to . . .
affirmatively search, screen, or scan†for CSAM. Id. §2258A(f)(3).
When NCMEC receives a report through the CyberTipline, it is statutorily
obligated to make that report "available to the appropriate law enforcement
agency for its review and potential investigation.†34 U.S.C.
§11293(b)(1)(K)(i)(II); see also App'x at 301. The report generated by NCMEC
follows a standardized format; Section A details the information reported by the
ESP, and Sections B and C set forth additional information provided by NCMEC.
See, e.g., App'x at 90. Section D lists the contact information of the law
enforcement agency to whom the report was provided. See App'x at 90.
Section B provides information that is "automatically generated by
NCMEC Systems,†including the ï¬le name for any ï¬les designated as a "hash
match†and a categorization of those ï¬les. App'x at 95. "The 'Hash Match'
designation indicates that the uploaded ï¬le matches the hash value of an
uploaded ï¬le from a CyberTipline report that was previously viewed and
categorized by NCMEC.†App'x at 95. Possible categorizations include
"Apparent Child Pornography,†"Child Unclothed,†and "CP (Unconï¬rmed).â€
App'x at 108. This section also provides a "Geo-Lookup†for the internet
protocol ("IPâ€) address of the user account associated with the suspected CSAM
ï¬les, and the IP address from which activity involving the ï¬les occurred,
identifying an internet provider and general geographic location for those IP
addresses. See App'x at 108. Section C 9
NCMEC staff†which may include "data gathered from queries on publicly-
available, open-source websites.†App'x at 109. Information in Section C is input
by "actual human beings . . . as opposed to computer-generated.†App'x at 292.
II. The Searches of Guard's Accounts
On September 18, 2020, Kik used the CyberTipline to report seven ï¬les
containing apparent CSAM to NCMEC. See App'x at 89-98 (CyberTipline Report
79722638). According to the Report, on September 16, 2020, an individual using
the Kik username "ski18taco†had sent these seven ï¬les to other Kik accounts in
private chat messages. See App'x at 91-94. The Report provided the IP address
associated with the account assigned username "ski18taco†and indicated that
the IP address was located in Queensbury, New York. See App'x at 95. It also
designated ï¬ve of the seven ï¬les as "hash matches,†three of which were
identiï¬ed as "CP (Unconï¬rmed)†and two of which were identiï¬ed as "Apparent
Child Pornography.†App'x at 95.4
Based on the location associated with the IP address, NCMEC forwarded
the report to the New York State Police, speciï¬cally, the Internet Crimes Against
Children ("ICACâ€) taskforce located in Albany, New York. On October 31, 2020,
State Police Investigator Brandon Hudson served an administrative summons on
Charter Communications, an internet service provider, seeking subscriber
information associated with the IP address identiï¬ed in the September 2020
Report. Charter reported that the IP address had been assigned to Guard's
account from March 17, 2019, through October 28, 2020. See App'x at 741-42.
Charter also provided a service address in Queensbury, New York. See App'x at
741. Another law enforcement agent later obtained lease agreements conï¬rming
that Guard had resided at the Queensbury address provided by Charter "from
January 15, 2019[,] to November 30, 2020.†App'x at 79.
On January 21, 2021, Kik ï¬led a second CyberTipline Report relevant to
Guard, attaching 18 ï¬les containing apparent CSAM. See App'x at 99-111
(CyberTipline Report 84703878). Kik reported that an individual using the Kik
username "ski118tacoâ€5 had shared these ï¬les with other Kik accounts, by
private or group message, between December 27, 2020, and December 31, 2020.
See App'x at 101-08. The messages were sent from an IP address located in
Queensbury, New York, though not the same IP address identiï¬ed in the
September 2020 Report. See App'x at 76-77.
NCMEC forwarded the January 2021 Report to the Albany ICAC taskforce.
The Report identiï¬ed six of the ï¬les as hash matches, four of which were
categorized by NCMEC as "Apparent Child Pornography,†one as "CP
(Unconï¬rmed),†and one as "Child Unclothed.†App'x at 108.
On February 26, 2021, Investigator Ryan Maestro served an administrative
summons on Charter Communications seeking subscriber information for the IP
address in the January 2021 Report. See App'x at 76-77. Charter responded that
the subscriber was Wesley Guard, and the IP address at issue had been assigned
to his "account from October 29, 2020[,] until March 2, 2021.†App'x at 77.
Charter also provided a physical address in Queensbury, New York. See App'x
at 77. Maestro also ran a criminal history check on Guard; when he discovered a
2011 conviction for Sexual Misconduct, Maestro checked the New York Sex
Offender Registry and conï¬rmed that Guard was listed as living at the address
provided by Charter. See App'x at 78.
Special Agent James Hamilton of the United States Immigration and
Customs Enforcement Office of Homeland Security Investigations ("HSIâ€)12
worked with the Albany ICAC taskforce, "reviewed the ï¬les that Kik reported to
NCMEC,†App'x at 72, and determined that four of the ï¬les identiï¬ed in the
September 2020 Report and seven of the ï¬les identiï¬ed in the January 2021
Report "depict[ed] child pornography as deï¬ned by 18 U.S.C. §2256,†App'x at
72, 75.
On April 27, 2021, a federal judge issued a search warrant for Guard's
residence "for evidence of the possession, distribution, and receipt of child
pornography.†App'x at 80-81. The warrant was executed on April 29, 2021.
"Just prior to the execution of the search at Guard's residence,†Hamilton,
Maestro, and State Police Investigator Thomas Gibney approached Guard at his
place of employment and brought him to a State Police facility. App'x at 80.
"At the station, [Hamilton] read [Guard] a Miranda warning from an
Immigration and Customs Enforcement form, which [Guard] initialed as it was
being read to him.â€6 App'x at 80-81. Guard "then signed a written waiver of his
Miranda rights, which also was signed as witnessed by†Hamilton and Maestro.
App'x at 81. Guard was then interviewed by the officers. During the interview,
Guard stated that he had used Kik in the past, having had two or three accounts
over time, but that he had stopped using it "[t]hree, four months ago.†App'x at
750. Guard recalled that he had used the usernames "ski18taco†and
"ski118taco,†and also identiï¬ed a third username, "the18taco,†of which law
enforcement was previously unaware. See App'x at 766. Guard admitted that he
had seen child pornography in the chat rooms, see App'x at 754, and that he had
been "looking at child pornography†for a while, but "not long,†App'x at 758.
Guard also agreed that he had "uploaded child pornography into a group usingâ€
his Kik accounts, App'x at 756 — speciï¬cally, that he had shared child
pornography images among various Kik groups, see App'x at 759.
On June 14, 2021, Hamilton secured a warrant to obtain "subscriber
information, text message content, picture message content, video message
content, and any and all images generated in the Kik accounts, including
metadata,†regarding the three Kik usernames acknowledged by Guard in his
interview. App'x at 85. Kik produced records, including hundreds of "pages of
user log activity . . . in response to that warrant.†App'x at 321.
Affirmed
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Wesley Guard?
The outcome was: The defendant is sentenced on Counts 4,5,6 of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 151 months, counts to run concurrently; The Court will recommend to the BOP that the defendant receive Sex Offender and Mental Health treatment while incarcerated; 15 years Supervised Release to follow, to run concurrently, with standard and special conditions - The Court adopts the special conditions and makes them a part of this record; Special conditions including Sex Offender Specific conditions (CIMP Exhibit 1 included); Mental Health treatment, Psychosexual evaluation, No marijuana/CBD/THC, and limit to one internet capable device; No Fine; No Restitution; $300.00 Special Assessment; Forfeiture previously Dismissed. Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Wesley Guard?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Albany County), NY. The presiding judge was Mae A. D'Agostino.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Wesley Guard?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Albany. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Albany Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Wesley Guard decided?
This case was decided on September 10, 2025.