Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Magnetsafety.Org, et al. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Date: 03-03-2025

Case Number: 22-9578

Judge: Moritz

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Denver County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Gregory Dolin, New Civil Liberties Alliance, Washington, D.C.

Defendant's Attorney: Adam C. Jed, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C.

Description:
The New Civil Liberties Alliance challenged the issuance of regulations by the Consumer Product Safety dealing with small, high-powered magnets that can cause serious injury, and even death, whe ingested by children.



"The small, powerful magnets at issue here come in various shapes, such as

spheres, cubes, or cylinders, and can be assembled to create jewelry, sculptures, and

puzzles. See Safety Standard for Magnets, 87 Fed. Reg. 57756 (Sept. 21, 2022) (to be

codified at 12 C.F.R. §§ 1262.1—1262.5 ) [hereinafter Final Rule ]. Although

seemingly innocuous, these consumer products carry a "unique, hidden hazard” that

can have catastrophic consequences. Id. at 57772. When a child ingests two magnets,

or one magnet and another magnetic object (called a "ferromagnetic object”), the

attraction is so strong that they attempt to connect within the body, typically in the

digestive tract. 1 Id. at 57758. The magnets can then clamp tissue, cutting off blood

supply and resulting in necrosis in the intestines. Id. In other cases, the magnets rip

through the tissue, releasing intestinal contents into the body, which can lead to

sepsis. Id. at 57759. In one study of roughly 600 ingestions, more than half the

children treated required hospitalization, and nearly 10% died. Id."



The Commission initiated a rule making process in 2012.
Outcome:
Finding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission's action, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the regulation.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Magnetsafety.Org, et al. Consumer Product Safety Commission?

The outcome was: Finding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission's action, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the regulation.

Which court heard Magnetsafety.Org, et al. Consumer Product Safety Commission?

This case was heard in United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Denver County), CO. The presiding judge was Moritz.

Who were the attorneys in Magnetsafety.Org, et al. Consumer Product Safety Commission?

Plaintiff's attorney: Gregory Dolin, New Civil Liberties Alliance, Washington, D.C.. Defendant's attorney: Adam C. Jed, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C..

When was Magnetsafety.Org, et al. Consumer Product Safety Commission decided?

This case was decided on March 3, 2025.