Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

The People of the State of Colorado v. In the Interest of J.E.B., a child

Date: 01-09-2025

Case Number: 21JV182

Judge: Robin Chittum

Court: District Court, El Paso County, Colorado

Plaintiff's Attorney: El Paso County, Colorado District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Colorado Springs Family Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Colorado Springs, Colorado family law lawyer represented the father of J.E.B. in a parental termination case.



In February 2021, the El Paso County Department of Human

Services (Department) filed a petition in dependency and neglect,

alleging, among other things, that father and mother were involved

in a domestic violence dispute, which resulted in father's arrest.

After a bench trial, the juvenile court adjudicated the child

dependent and neglected. The court then adopted a treatment plan

for father that required him to (1) communicate with the

Department; (2) develop parental protective capacity; (3) provide a

safe and stable home; (4) address domestic violence concerns; and

(5) engage in family time.

Outcome:
Father's parental rights were terminated.



Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of The People of the State of Colorado v. In the Interest of...?

The outcome was: Father's parental rights were terminated. Affirmed

Which court heard The People of the State of Colorado v. In the Interest of...?

This case was heard in District Court, El Paso County, Colorado, CO. The presiding judge was Robin Chittum.

Who were the attorneys in The People of the State of Colorado v. In the Interest of...?

Plaintiff's attorney: El Paso County, Colorado District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Colorado Springs Family Law Lawyer Directory.

When was The People of the State of Colorado v. In the Interest of... decided?

This case was decided on January 9, 2025.