Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
State of Missouri v. Gerald L. Smith, Jr.
Date: 07-29-2026
Case Number: 2116-CR04649-01
Judge: Charles E. McKenzie
Court: Circuit Court, Jackson County, Missouri
Plaintiff's Attorney: s Bue
Defendant's Attorney: Carl Bussey and Molly Hastings
Digested by: Kent Morlan
Where, as here, the charge is for statutory sodomy committed against a child, "time is not essential . . . because it can be impossible to ascertain specific dates of the sexual abuse." State v. Miller, 372 S.W.3d 455, 464 (Mo. banc 2012). Nonetheless, "the State should not be permitted to secure a conviction with respect to specific conduct occurring during a broadly stated yet substantially different period of time from that stated in the information and instruction." Id. at 465 (emphasis added) (reversing conviction because the evidence was insufficient to prove defendant committed statutory sodomy within the year in which the offense was charged when the evidence at trial related to a completely different year-long time frame). Indeed, as the Miller court noted, the State could have charged Miller with two counts of statutory sodomy based on the two distinct time frames; thus, if the convictions were allowed to stand, Miller could later be charged with another offense arising out of the same circumstances for which he had already been convicted. Id. at 468.
About This Case
What was the outcome of State of Missouri v. Gerald L. Smith, Jr.?
The outcome was: The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 20 years in prison. Where, as here, the charge is for statutory sodomy committed against a child, "time is not essential . . . because it can be impossible to ascertain specific dates of the sexual abuse." State v. Miller, 372 S.W.3d 455, 464 (Mo. banc 2012). Nonetheless, "the State should not be permitted to secure a conviction with respect to specific conduct occurring during a broadly stated yet substantially different period of time from that stated in the information and instruction." Id. at 465 (emphasis added) (reversing conviction because the evidence was insufficient to prove defendant committed statutory sodomy within the year in which the offense was charged when the evidence at trial related to a completely different year-long time frame). Indeed, as the Miller court noted, the State could have charged Miller with two counts of statutory sodomy based on the two distinct time frames; thus, if the convictions were allowed to stand, Miller could later be charged with another offense arising out of the same circumstances for which he had already been convicted. Id. at 468.
Which court heard State of Missouri v. Gerald L. Smith, Jr.?
This case was heard in Circuit Court, Jackson County, Missouri, MO. The presiding judge was Charles E. McKenzie.
Who were the attorneys in State of Missouri v. Gerald L. Smith, Jr.?
Plaintiff's attorney: s Bue. Defendant's attorney: Carl Bussey and Molly Hastings.
When was State of Missouri v. Gerald L. Smith, Jr. decided?
This case was decided on July 29, 2026.